The Fallacy of Evolutionary Theory

No. This is not how things happen.

No. This is not how things happen.

The subject of evolution is one that needs addressing because far too many people, including many supposedly ‘awakened’ people, believe in it. They believe in it because it is dressed up as science and it is taught in schools and universities as fact. Add to that, the endless David Attenborough documentaries on the television, and there you go. That’s why most people, including a large percentage of ‘White Nationalists’, believe in this Jewish lie of ‘evolution’. In reality, evolutionary theory is a trick played upon people’s minds and imaginations. It is indeed a deception, and one that I used to believe in. Therefore, I understand the thought process from the point of view of a believer. Now I’m going to pick it to shreds!

How ‘Evolutionary Theory’ Is Supposed To Work

The basic premise is that all life as we know it evolved from a single cell. The cell then divided itself and began multiplying until there were many more cells. Single celled organisms then began combining with other cells producing more complex lifeforms. Keep in mind that this is supposedly what was happening on earth 4.5 billion years ago. The complexity and number of lifeforms kept on increasing as time went on, until we have what we have today – countless different species all inhabiting the earth, interdependent on each other. OK, so it sounds like a reasonable theory given the time frame we are dealing with. 4.5 billion years is such a long period of time that almost anything could have evolved out of the original lifeforms. The differences in species are all a result of genetic mutations, which happened to work out favourably. The stronger, more adaptable species survived and prospered, gaining many more favourable genetic enhancements over time.

That is the basic scope of macro-evolutionary theory. There are of course many ‘scientists’ out there who tweak certain details and have their own ideas about what to insert into their version of the theory, but in order that the trees should not block out the forest, it is best to analyse the way the theory works, and not get caught up on minor details.

The ‘Evidence’ Presented To Prove ‘Evolutionary Theory’

The only evidence used to support macro-evolution as an idea, is what they have termed micro-evolution. This is where the dirty little trick lies! See, what they call micro-evolution is really only the adaption of species, and of course there is plenty of evidence supporting the idea that a species adapts to its environment and the strongest, best suited survive, while the weaker defectives die off. I would have thought the adaption process of a species to be plainly obvious, since every species lives in an environment and of course it will adapt. Certain genetic traits which favour the best and brightest of the species are bound to come to the fore, if nature is allowed to take its course, and the defective, less useful traits become less common. This is why eugenics is a good idea and it works for people, as well as cattle. (Cattle breeding programs are a great example of how you can breed a species for certain traits) Note that the adaption of species is not driven by genetic mutations, rather it is simply the natural weeding out of crap genes and a concentration of the good genes already present in the species!

The Concept Of Species Or ‘Kind’

This is an area where evolutionists have all sorts of trouble. They cannot accurately define the concept, and in fact, given that they believe all organisms and all species are in transitional mutation mode, all the time; the very concept of any distinct kind is blurred. If all the lines between what constitutes a kind are blurred, then there is no rational or moral basis with which you can justify preserving any kind. This is something to think about if you are a White Nationalist, because evolutionary theory invalidates the entire idea of preserving your kind. If Whites have a common ancestor with every other race and creature on earth, then why would you care if whites died out, and at what point would someone be white enough? We would re-evolve in a couple billion years time anyway, since it happened once before, right?

Also, in lock step with the marxists; the evolutionists will insist that all races of ‘humans’ are the same species or kind, yet if an evolutionist points to a small adaptational difference in the beak of some particular bird, then that apparently constitutes a different species! This is what is called ‘playing‘ with the definition of species/kind.

That's why it requires a 'leap of faith'!

That’s why it requires a ‘leap of faith’!

The Leap Of Faith

Evolutionists never believe that their idea could be wrong because of the ‘oh, it’s science‘ factor. The only scientific thing about evolutionary theory is the adaption of species explained above, which isn’t evolution anyway, and in no way does it affirm macro-evolution!

The Leap of Faith for evolutionists is rather bizarre when broken down into its components: 1.) They rightly accept the incorrectly termed micro-evolution (adaption of species) as fact, then 2.) They add 4.5 billion years or so to the equation, a conjectural figure to say the least, but beside the point, then 3.) they add to the mix the idea of gene mutation as the driving factor behind the existence of different species, and now macro-evolution must be true? Really? They go from adaptation of species, where every species only adapts according to what is in its natural genetic code, to mutant theory. That is not what ‘micro-evolution’ proves in any way, shape or form, and macro-evolution is therefore a religious belief!

Genetic Mutation Is Needed For The Theory To ‘Work’

Without the idea of genetic mutation driving evolution, it is impossible to get different species in the first place if there was only one cell. That is why it is the central pillar behind macro-evolutionary theory. If you have a whole bunch of different creatures, then the only way of explaining the gap from one creature to another, is to insist that it happened as a result of gene mutation. The only way they can get away with such ridiculous speculation and pass it off as proven science, is by emphasizing the 4.5 billion year time frame, and that is of course, what they do. People’s imaginations take over when pondering such vast amounts of time and that’s when the gullibility factor rises to the fore. They will insist that gene mutation ‘evolution’ occurs at such a slow rate, that it isn’t measurable if you just look at recent times – rather convenient, wouldn’t you say!

No. These transitional missing links don't exist.

No. These transitional missing links don’t exist.

Missing Links

The complete absence of ‘missing links’ from the fossil record is another stumbling block for evolutionists. If all life came from one cell, then we are all related. You could pick any two lifeforms on earth and somewhere back in the past there should be a common ancestor, known as a ‘missing link’. Because none of these missing links actually exist, they are forced to point to creatures that died out a long time ago – and specifically, ones that happen to resemble a couple of creatures still alive today. Since the ancient creature died out, no-one will find them alive today and burst the bubble, so the evolutionist can insist that it is a missing link of the two. Most of their attempts to find missing links are fairly half-hearted and speculative, to say the least. Add to this, the divergent lines which should be traceable in the fossil record between any missing link and whatever two modern creatures allegedly evolved from it. Unfortunately for evolutionists, no such diverging and gradually mutating lines exist, therefore the theory is bunk. If it were true, the fossil record would tell the story.

Marxism

Evolutionary Theory and Marxism

The link between evolutionary theory and Marxism is one that not many White Nationalists seem to notice, although it is actually quite obvious when you break it down. Now, Darwin wasn’t a Jew, but his work in trying to scientifically prove macro-evolution sure did give the Jews a ‘scientific front’ for this updated version of the primordial ooze theory. Natural selection and adaption of species are not the same thing as gene mutating macro-evolution, and that’s what Darwin found out himself by providing evidence for the first two and then banging his head against a brick wall looking for proof of kinds mutating into different kinds.

Marxists all have a fundamental belief that there is no such thing as race, and even if there is, then it is all a result of environmental factors. They believe that because we all evolved from one common ancestor back in Africa, that therefore racial discrimination isn’t warranted because we are all the same if you go back far enough. The difference is only skin-deep, they tend to say. Now, how are the Marxists justifying their opposition to the recognition of the reality of race? By using evolutionary theory! Evolutionary theory justifies the Marxist position, because it, like Marxism, fundamentally espouses a belief that it was only the environment which was responsible for different organisms evolving differently. Think about this: if life came about as a result of one cell, with no creative designing force in the world, then the environment has to be the only factor which caused all life to turn into what it is! Evolutionary theory is probably more Marxist than Marxism, and we all know how much trouble we get in when we embrace the false Marxist dialectic of oppressor and oppressed!

White Nationalist’s Who Believe In Evolutionary Theory

Most White Nationalists of this mindset are determined to be narrow-minded and defend their evolutionary delusions at any cost. As a result, they insist that Whites evolved in the freezing ice-age conditions of Northern Europe, then ignore the fact that they didn’t leave any infrastructure behind them, which would have indicated their presence. The strangest thing about this belief, apart from it being insane, is that if you were a creature capable of surviving ice-age Northern Europe without infrastructure necessary for warmth and sustaining population, then surely you’d be smart enough to look for sunnier pastures somewhere else? Why would the White man sit there freezing and not go exploring for more fertile grounds? It doesn’t make any sense, to put it mildly, and this from the most evolved race of all? These sorts of White Nationalists will also insist that Whites have built civilizations everywhere except for the land of Ancient Israel and Judah. Why? Because if they considered the possibility that the Israelites were White, it’d lend credence to what’s in the Bible, and that goes directly against evolutionary theory!

Further food for thought: if you believe in evolution, then you believe that somewhere way back there is a missing link common ancestor of both whites and negroes. There has to be, according to the theory. If I were to make a guess I’d say that this missing link would look like some sort of coffee-coloured nearly-man. Now, how can anyone reconcile the idea of this coffee-coloured nearly-man spawning both pitch black negoes and lily white Nordics, with reality? Because this scenario is nuttier than a trip to a nut factory; there is only one answer – they will say that blacks got blacker because of the hot sun in Africa, whilst the Nordics turned white due to lack of sun in Northern Europe. They will also say that Africa was a land of plenty so the blacks developed dumb and lazy, and Europe was a harsh climate so whites developed their survival capabilities that way. Whilst environment obviously does affect racial development to a certain limited extent, the evolutionist will try and tell you that it was only the environment that led the two divergent spawns of the coffee-coloured nearly-man to evolve completely differently, and against genetic logic. According to the evolutionist logic, if you stuck a bunch of negroes in Scandinavia (which the Jews are currently doing) and gave them a few thousand years, they would likely evolve white! What nonsense! If that were true, then why haven’t Eskimos evolved into super-Nordics? This is a case of the marxist-evolutionist-environmental-theory applied to race, without a doubt.

Biblical Law Of Species/Kind

I’ve heard it said that the best truths are usually kept simple. The Biblical Law of kind after kind is one such truth. It is as simple as it gets, and it is 100% reliable. If you get the male and female of any one kind to reproduce – what do you get? Another of the same kind! It doesn’t say ‘kind gradually begets another kind’ or ‘kind slowly but surely morphs into something else’ – and that’s because they don’t. Unfortunately for modern society, the Bible is viewed as unscientific, so people pay no attention to this obvious and natural law, instead preferring the genetic mutant theory.

DNA - it doesn't need to be tampered with.

DNA – it doesn’t need to be tampered with.

DNA Structure And The Complexity Of Species

The fact that DNA is such an incredibly complex blueprint for each and every species, certainly points to an intelligent designer. It is the code for building each species and each part of the code exists for a specific purpose. Therefore, one part of the code cannot exist without the other bits already being there. For example, the eye has a pupil and it also has an optic nerve. Without a pupil, the optic nerve would not serve any purpose, and vice versa. So to say that all the interdependent parts of any species would just evolve and all the bits somehow fit together with no guidance or ‘planned end-product‘, is quite simply a joke.

Genetic Mutation Is Not A Good Thing

I find it surprising that more people can’t work this out. A genetic mutation in your cells is a corruption, and it usually results in a tumour or a cancer. There are no known cases of any good genetic mutations, except for the ones dreamed up in the evolutionist’s head. Down Syndrome, cancer, and any number of genetic problems spring to mind, all of which, are disastrous and deadly. Nature doesn’t appreciate the genetically corrupted individual in any species and usually they have great trouble reproducing (and I’m not talking about idiot welfare ‘whites’ of low stock, by the way). Even if it were possible to get a positive genetic mutation, what are the chances of finding an appropriate partner who will pass the gene on? The species in question would have to form a kind of ‘group mutation club‘, with the power of telepathically working out what sort of mutations everyone else is planning to pass on!

Intelligent Design

The alternative to the theory of evolution is the fact of nature that kind begets more it’s own kind. For this reason, I believe that all pure species/kinds were created by an intelligent designer, or God, if you like. I do not claim to know the mechanisms of how the Creator did this great work of creation, although he clearly did do it or we wouldn’t be here. You can’t get something out of nothing, without creative energy – this is the Creators domain, not ours to comprehend.

Purity is crucial and the Swastika symbolizes it well!

Purity is crucial and the Swastika symbolizes it well!

Purity Versus Hybridization

All lifeforms on earth fall in one of two categories; they are either pure creations or they are a mixed hybrid. The hybrid is created only of this earth, and is not one of the Creator’s designs. Therefore any mixed person cannot possess the spirit of the Almighty. Purity is the ideal state for all species, and hybridization is ultimately what brings evil into the world – I.e. the Jews.

The Jewish Motive For Pushing Evolution

Apart from the fact that ‘evolution’ is really just the environmental theory of marxism repackaged to deal with life and nature, rather than history and politics; there are other motives as to why the Jews sell us this bogus idea. A huge part of this is because they know who we are. The Jews know that WE (Whites) are the Adamic race of Yahweh in the Bible, and that THEY are the children and dedicated servants of Satan. They understand this, while we don’t, at this point in time. The job of evolutionary theory is to try and discredit the Bible in the eyes of White Adamic people. The consequence of this is that we lose any sense of ourselves as a special creative elect. Once our identity is lost, then we become just another lifeform that evolved from the slime – exactly what the Jews want us to think, and exactly where we’ll end up if we don’t wake up to who we truly are!

Who’s Religious?

I don’t accept things based upon blind-faith and I never will. It takes time to analyse and think through all of these concepts and to sift through the information. When I first worked all this stuff out regarding the Bible and how evolutionary theory is used destructively against us, I was very surprised, to say the least. I am absolutely certain that the Bible is correct about the nature of species and their origins. The ‘how‘ mechanism of creation is not explained in the Bible because we, as the Creators products, can never be on that higher level. It’s beyond our comprehension. What can be established for sure, is that ‘kind after kind’ makes far more sense than evolutionary theory, and it is demonstrably observable in reality! The evolutionists BELIEVE in something that has never been observed or proven to have happened, yet apparently if you adhere to ‘kind after kind’ from the Bible, it is a religious act of blind faith.

The Joke’s on them!

HitlerGottMitUns

– White Racial I.D. Admin

15 thoughts on “The Fallacy of Evolutionary Theory

    1. hans faasse

      Great analysis of the evolution theory. Do the same for the bible. The way the book has been put together, by whom and for what purpose. There is no such thing as a creationist, god, or alike. The alternative is neither the evolution theory. When we put that all aside and don’t jump on anybody’s wagon we may be able, with an open mind, to discover the real origin of life.

      Like

      1. White Racial I.D. Admin Post author

        Glad you thought the article made sense! The Bible is a book of history, ethics, and prophesy. The people of the Bible are the White Race descending from Adam and it’s antagonists are satan’s children, aka the jews of today.
        “There is no such thing as a creationist, god, or alike.” – Yes there is, otherwise nothing would exist, certainly no life with a conscience…. You may as well ‘believe’ in evolutionary theory if you think there is no creator…. https://whiteracialidentity.net/2015/06/15/atheism-is-a-jewish-concept/

        Like

  1. Wolfie C Wolfgang

    …the only way of getting rid of Christianity is to allow it to die little by little.” –Hitler’s Table Talk, pg 61

    “It’s Christianity that’s the liar. It’s in perpetual conflict with itself.” –Hitler’s Table Talk, pg 61

    “In the long run, National Socialism and religion will no longer be able to exist together.” –Hitler’s Table Talk, pg 6

    “Kerrl, with the noblest of intentions, wanted to attempt a synthesis between National Socialism and Christianity. I don’t believe the thing’s possible, and I see the obstacle in Christianity itself.” –Hitler’s Table Talk, pg 145

    “As far as we are concerned, we’ve succeeded in chasing the Jews from our midst and excluding Christianity from our political life.” –Hitler’s Table Talk, pg 394

    “There is something very unhealthy about Christianity.” –Hitler’s Table Talk, pg 418

    “The reason why the ancient world was so pure, light and serene was that it knew nothing of the two great scourges: the pox and Christianity. Christianity is a prototype of Bolshevism: the mobilisation by the Jew of the masses of slaves with the object of undermining society. Thus one understands that the healthy elements of the Roman world were proof against this doctrine.” –Hitler’s Table Talk, pg 75-76

    “When all is said, we have no reason to wish that the Italians and Spaniards should free themselves from the drug of Christianity. Let’s be the only people who are immunised against the disease.” –Hitler’s Table Talk, pg 145

    “Our epoch will certainly see the end of the disease of Christianity. It will last another hundred years, two hundred years perhaps. My regret will have been that I couldn’t, like whoever the prophet was, behold the promised land from afar. We are entering into a conception of the world that will be a sunny era, an era of tolerance.” –Hitler’s Table Talk, pg 343-344

    “Pure Christianity—the Christianity of the catacombs—is concerned with translating the Christian doctrine into facts. It leads quite simply to the annihilation of mankind.” –Hitler’s Table Talk, pg 146

    “Christianity is the worst of the regressions that mankind can ever have undergone, and it’s the Jew who, thanks to this diabolic invention, has thrown him back fifteen centuries.” –Hitler’s Table Talk, pg 322

    “The heaviest blow that ever struck humanity was the coming of Christianity. Bolshevism is Christianity’s illegitimate child. Both are inventions of the Jew. The deliberate lie in the matter of religion was introduced into the world by Christianity. Bolshevism practises a lie of the same nature, when it claims to bring liberty to men, whereas in reality it seeks only to enslave them. In the ancient world, the relations between men and gods were founded on an instinctive respect. It was a world enlightened by the idea of tolerance. Christianity was the first creed in the world to exterminate its adversaries in the name of love. Its key-note is intolerance.” –Hitler’s Table Talk, pg 7

    “But Christianity is an invention of sick brains : one could imagine nothing more senseless, nor any more indecent way of turning the idea of the Godhead into a mockery. A negro with his tabus is crushingly superior to the human being who seriously believes in Transubstantiation.” –Hitler’s Table Talk, pg 144

    “It took fourteen centuries for Christianity to reach the peak of savagery and stupidity.” –Hitler’s Table Talk, pg 314

    “Let it not be said that Christianity brought man the life of the soul, for that evolution was in the natural order of things.” –Hitler’s Table Talk, pg 7

    “We must recognise, of course, that, amongst us, Christianity is coloured by Germanism.” –Hitler’s Table Talk, pg 46

    “We’ll see to it that the Churches cannot spread abroad teachings in conflict with the interests of the State. We shall continue to preach the doctrine of National Socialism, and the young will no longer be taught anything but the truth.” –Hitler’s Table Talk, pg 62

    “Christianity is a rebellion against natural law, a protest against nature. Taken to its logical extreme, Christianity would mean the systematic cultivation of the human failure.” –Hitler’s Table Talk, pg 51

    “By nature the Duce is a freethinker, but he decided to choose the path of concessions. For my part, in his place I’d have taken the path of revolution. I’d have entered the Vatican and thrown everybody out—reserving the right to apologise later: “Excuse me, it was a mistake.” But the result would have been, they’d have been outside!” –Hitler’s Table Talk, pg 145

    “So it’s not opportune to hurl ourselves now into a struggle with the Churches. The best thing is to let Christianity die a natural death. A slow death has something comforting about it. The dogma of Christianity gets worn away before the advances of science. Religion will have to make more and more concessions. Gradually the myths crumble. All that’s left is to prove that in nature there is no frontier between the organic and the inorganic.” –Hitler’s Table Talk, pg 59

    “But, even so, it’s impossible eternally to hold humanity in bondage with lies. After all, it was only between the sixth and eighth centuries that Christianity was imposed on our peoples by princes who had an alliance of interests with the shavelings. Our peoples had previously succeeded in living all right without this religion. I have six divisions of SS composed of men absolutely indifferent in matters of religion. It doesn’t prevent them from going to their deaths with serenity in their souls.” –Hitler’s Table Talk, pg 143

    “Had Charles Martel not been victorious at Poitiers—already, you see, the world had fallen into the hands of the Jews, so gutless a thing was Christianity!—then we should in all probability have been converted to Mohammedanism, that cult which glorifies heroism and which opens the seventh Heaven to the bold warrior alone. Then the Germanic races would have conquered the world. Christianity alone prevented them from doing so.” –Hitler’s Table Talk, pg 667 (Talk about Islamo-fascism!)

    “The priests of antiquity were closer to nature, and they sought modestly for the meaning of things. Instead of that, Christianity promulgates its inconsistent dogmas and imposes them by force. Such a religion carries within it intolerance and persecution. It’s the bloodiest conceivable.” –Hitler’s Table Talk, pg 322-323

    “One cannot succeed in conceiving how much cruelty, ignominy and falsehood the intrusion of Christianity has spelt for this world of ours. If the misdeeds of Christianity were less serious in Italy, that’s because the people of Rome, having seen them at work, always knew exactly the worth of the Popes before whom Christendom prostrated itself.” –Hitler’s Table Talk, pg 288

    “With what clairvoyance the authors of the eighteenth, and especially those of the past, century criticised Christianity and passed judgment on the evolution of the Churches!” –Hitler’s Table Talk, pg 88

    “When understanding of the universe has become widespread, when the majority of men know that the stars are not sources of light but worlds, perhaps inhabited worlds like ours, then the Christian doctrine will be convicted of absurdity.” –Hitler’s Table Talk, pg 59

    “The fact that the Japanese have retained their political philosophy, which is one of the essential reasons for their successes, is due to their having been saved in time from the views of Christianity.” –Hitler’s Table Talk, pg 393

    “This terrorism in religion is the product, to put it briefly, of a Jewish dogma, which Christianity has universalised and whose effect is to sow trouble and confusion in men’s minds.” –Hitler’s Table Talk, pg 393

    “It may be asked whether concluding a concordat with the churches wouldn’t facilitate our exercise of power…. I’m convinced that any pact with the Church can offer only a provisional benefit, for sooner or later the scientific spirit will disclose the harmful character of such a compromise. Thus the State will have based its existence on a foundation that one day will collapse.” –Hitler’s Table Talk, pp. 58-59

    “It is to these private customs that peoples owe their present characters. Christianity, of course, has reached the peak of absurdity in this respect. And that’s why one day its structure will collapse. Science has already impregnated humanity. Consequently, the more Christianity clings to its dogmas, the quicker it will decline.” –Hitler’s Table Talk, pg 60 https://plus.google.com/107379473079397461092/posts/Uy7UsLtrpVd?pid=6175717028773163058&oid=107379473079397461092

    Like

    1. White Racial I.D. Admin Post author

      No, it’s the Jews that are the problem and they have lied to you about Christianity. Why don’t you try reading Mein Kampf, go through Hitlers speeches, then consider why wherever the Germans went Churches were either built or re-opened and synagogues shut, rather than buying into fraudulent material such as “Table Talk” released after Hitlers death under Jewish auspices? The Soviets did the opposite to the Germans and left synagogues untouched while Priests were tortured and boiled alive and churches were destroyed…. Things don’t have to be much more obvious do they….. This illustrates the true dynamic: https://whiteracialidentity.net/2015/11/04/the-national-socialist-christian-crusaders-came-to-fight-godless-communists/ so get a grip man!
      And besides, your comment has nothing to do with the evolution topic, so in future, at least try to keep your comments relevant to the topic at hand….

      Like

  2. Pingback: Multicultural Genocide of White Protestant America | Economic & Multicultural Terrorism

  3. Shaun

    You have to laugh at the single reference of ‘Table Talk’ , just the name of the book implies no credibility, let alone reference after reference from the one source material, even if any of that was true (and it’s not) you wouldn’t take it seriously. Good article, I came to my own realisation that evolutionary theory is by definition ‘unscientific’ .

    Like

Comments are closed.