Category Archives: Jews / Jewish Problem

Christogenea Saturdays with Bill Finck (18/4/15)

ChristSwastika

(Note: This is the show I did on Christogenea Radio nearly 2 months ago, in case you missed it.)

After corresponding with Bill for about a year or so I finally appeared on his radio program this morning (Saturday night in the US). It was a good show and I think we hit a number of good topics including the biggest lie of all-time, namely that the Jews are “God’s Chosen People”. They are of course Satan’s children through Cain, and it must be said: the Jews are doing a damn good job of fulfilling their role of ‘pure evil’ in the world. Their Canaanite/Edomite blood ensures they obey their father, the devil. Will the pure White Adamic people ever realize who they truly are?

Download Show

Judaism & Christianity – Polar Opposites

The following table is another excerpt from the book “Who is Esau-Edom?” by Charles A. Weisman. It’s pretty self-explanatory:

Contrasting

It is clear that the Jewish and Christian mindsets are diametrically opposed to one another just by reading through this table, not to mention the fact that there are many more opposing laws which could also have been included, making one giant table!

Christianity certainly DID NOT come from Judaism or it would follow similar principles, so whenever anyone says that it did, you know right away that they do not understand Christian principles and how it truly works. The truth of the matter is that Judaism reflects the Jews racial nature as a mixed-mongrelised group, and Christianity reflects the racial nature of the White Adamic race.

Christianity and Judaism are polar opposites and anyone who says otherwise is an idiot or knows no better. Everything we see coming from modern churches or so-called “Judeo-Christianity” reflects the high level of Jewish infiltration and subversion of the institutions which are supposed to espouse Christianity.

Christian Identity is the only true Christianity because it correctly interprets the Bible and discards all the garbage and perversions the Jews have inserted.

– White Racial I.D. Admin

How Jewish “Zionism” relates to Biblical Prophecy

The Jews establishing their international swindling headquarters in Palestine, under the guise of a political movement known as Zionism, is indeed a fulfillment of Biblical Prophecy, only they are fulfilling the role of Esau-Edom, and most definitely NOT Jacob-Israel!

The following passage is from the book “Who is Esau-Edom?” by Charles A. Weisman, and it should clear up any doubts people may have regarding the true intentions of the Jews occupying Palestine and naming their criminal state “Israel”:

PalestineProph

There is No Political Solution

Christogenea

This presentation is based on two short articles written by William Finck back in the Spring of 2009, There is No Political Solution and Who is your god? As well as a short discussion of certain current events which are relevant to the context.

Download Show

The Holocaust And The Liars at John 8:44

John 8:44

“You are of your father the devil, and you want to do the desires of your father. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth because there is no truth in him. Whenever he speaks a lie, he speaks from his own nature, for he is a liar and the father of lies.

From just a cursory glance at John 8:44 it is obvious what racial group is being referred to – I.e. The Canaanite/Edomite Jews. They are indeed the great “father of lies” who “speaks from his own nature”, and only they could possibly invent a hoax as big as the Holocaust!

– White Racial I.D. Admin

The Enemy of My Enemy is Not My Friend

This is a great first law on the constitution for any new nation.

This is a great first law on the constitution for any new nation.

There exists within secular White Nationalist circles this lingering idea that if a group doesn’t like the Jews, then they are our friends. Whilst hypothetically, if the interests of our race and the other race in question were complete separation and opposition to the Jewish problem, then we’d have mutually agreeable aims that we could work towards. Fact is though, the best that we can ever hope for among non-whites is a general hatred of Jewry which usually comes as a result of the Jewish wars in the middle-east, and rightfully so. What will never (or very rarely) happen is non-whites opposing Jewry and wanting separation from their White host nations. This is obviously because they are the prime beneficiaries of the Jewish communist systems running the west nowadays. This scenario will never change with non-white racial groups, and as a consequence it is a waste of time to ever think we will be able to work with them in any serious way against Jewry. Hell, we can’t even work with the vast majority of our own race, let alone others!

This brings us to the topic of how Islam works with Jewry:

No Islam either.

No Islam either.

The most common ‘enemy of our enemy’ you’ll hear about is the Muslims or sometimes ‘the Arabs.’ We all know there are loads of Muslims who aren’t Arabs, but these terms are used almost interchangeably, so whatever – I’ll just refer to them as Arabs, meaning the Muslims of Arab racial mixture.

The ultimate reason why we will never be able to work with the Arab/Muslim world is because they descend from the Seed of the Serpent, which is exactly the same seed Jewry comes from.

The Serpent and arrow forming a dollar sign - rather appropriate

The Serpent and arrow forming a dollar sign – how appropriate!

The Jews and Arabs share a lot of the same DNA, and when you understand Scripture you realize it shows how the Seed of the Serpent will always be the eternal enemy of the White Adamic Man (see Genesis 3:15). Since both Jews and Arabs share the Serpent lineage, the only logical way to view Judaism and Islam is as a dual pronged attack against Christendom.

Is this not exactly what we see happening in reality?

Everywhere on earth the White Adamic Race (Christendom) is under attack. The more cunning and rat-like Jews have interbred their kind with predominately European Adamic people. As a result they have created a far ‘better disguised Satanic stock’ than the Arab Muslims, who’ve bred a lot more with darker negroid Northern African stock. The Arabs therefore are the Jews underlings, being of lower intellect and far lesser ability when it comes to organisation and ‘cunning.’ This is why the Jews are leading the attack against Christendom and allowing their Satanic brethren, the Arab Muslims, to do what they naturally do. When bad stuff happens like rape and small scale ‘terrorist acts’, (as it always does when Muslims are about the place) the Jew plays us off against them and hides in the shadows, usually complaining about how Jews are always victims of everything (read Holocaust).

In the more sophisticated examples of ‘TV-style Terrorism’, it is usually the Jews through Mossad and the relevant western intelligence agency carrying out the attack or pulling off the hoax, then blaming the Muslims. Either way, it seems to have the same net effect of Muslims getting the blame, guilty or not, while we’re not allowed to point the finger at Muslims as a group anymore, just the ‘extremists’, whatever that means. It’s the opposite scenario to 9-11 where we were 100% positively encouraged to blame Muslims, as a group, for something the Jews did.

Anyhow, add to this exciting mix of Jewish/Muslim terrorism, a flood of Asians, Blacks, and other assorted non-whites to destroy Christendom and we wind up exactly where we are today – seeing Revelation 17:15 playing out courtesy of:

6 points, 6 lines, 6 triangles = 666

6 points, 6 lines, 6 triangles = 666

In conclusion, the idea that ‘the enemy of my enemy is my friend’ has to go, because put simply, the Jews and the Arabs/Muslims hate us. The Anti-Islam political parties in Europe are useless because they love the Jews, and the secular White Nationalist idea of ‘getting in’ with the Muslims because they hate the Jews, is just as useless. They are both our eternal enemies and always will be. Just because Jews and Arabs hate each other doesn’t make it a good idea to side with either!

– White Racial I.D. Admin

Millions March in France to Denounce Terrorism and Promote Unity or Whatever

Lee Rogers
Daily Slave
January 12, 2014

Why are these people not demanding that all Moslems be removed from their country?

Why are these people not demanding that all Moslems be removed from their country?

Millions throughout France came out in the streets this weekend for a march to denounce terrorism and promote unity or something. The march was promoted by the French government and Jew run media outlets as a response to the Paris attacks by Moslem gunmen.

The problem is obvious, but the French government and the Jew run media want us to believe that this is some sort of complicated problem that requires complicated solutions. They are claiming that the problem is some sort of vague type of extremism without linking it to any one group of people. Therefore they claim we need to have thousands of riot police in the streets, spy on people’s communications and destroy privacy rights to fight said extremism.

Clearly, the vast majority of these attacks are carried about by Moslems. That much should be obvious to everyone. Therefore the problem is with Islam and the fact that it represents an ideology that is totally incompatible with Western countries. It has been this way for centuries. Therefore, it would make sense to remove these huge populations of Moslems from White European nations.

It is true that some of these attacks may have been financed by intelligence organizations like the Mossad and the CIA but that doesn’t change the fact that large numbers of Moslems should not be in Europe. By default, the threat of these types of attacks would be greatly reduced without large minority populations of Moslems in our countries. How difficult is this to figure out? Why is it that anyone having this view is demonized as some evil “Nazi” or “racist?” This is just basic common sense.

Instead, we are told that we have to bomb countries full of Moslems while simultaneously letting Moslems live inside White European countries. This is the most insane policy you can imagine and we are seeing the results of it. The alleged war on terror has only created a larger number of angry Moslems and rightfully so. Wouldn’t you be mad if an invading force came in and started killing your people? The only group of people this type of policy benefits are Jews who have sought to undermine the racial cohesion of all White European cultures since World War II. We see this with their non-stop promotion of subversive multicultural propaganda, race mixing and open border policies. They’re basically trying to get White Europeans and Moslems who they perceive as racial enemies to fight each other for their own benefit. This is why separation is the only real solution.

The French people should be denouncing Islam and demanding every Moslem be removed from their country immediately. Then they should demand a ban of all Jews from their country since it was Jew promoted policies that allowed such a situation to occur in the first place. The good news is that the war criminal Jew leader of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu is inviting French Jews to immigrate to Israel. I sincerely hope they take him up on his offer.

To conclude, this pathetic attempt by the French government and the Jew run media to misdirect people’s attention from what the real problem is will fail miserably.

Original Article

Gun Control in Germany, 1928-1945

Click image to visit

Click image to visit

By William Luther Pierce

A common belief among defenders of the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is that the National Socialist government of Germany under Adolf Hitler did not permit the private ownership of firearms. Totalitarian governments, they have been taught in their high school civics classes, do not trust their citizens and do not dare permit them to keep firearms. Thus, one often hears the statement, “You know, the first thing the Nazis did when they came to power was outlaw firearms,” or, “The first thing Hitler did in Germany was round up all the guns.”

One can understand why many American gun owners want to believe this. They see in the current effort of their own government to take away their right to keep and bear arms a limitation of an essential element of their freedom and a move toward tyranny, and they want to characterize the gun-grabbers in the most negative way they can. Adolf Hitler has been vilified continuously for the past 60 years or so by the mass media in America, and certainly no politician or officeholder wants to be compared with him. If the gun-confiscation effort can be portrayed convincingly as something of which Hitler would have approved, it will have been effectively tarred.

This identification of the inclination to deny citizens the right to keep and bear arms with National Socialism and Adolf Hitler has been strengthened recently by clever magazine advertisements which show Hitler with his arm outstretched in a Roman salute under a heading: “All in favor of gun control raise your right hand.” A Jewish group, Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership (JPFO), quite noisy for its size, has been especially zealous in promoting the idea that the current gun-control effort in America has its roots in Germany during the Hitler period. This group has gone so far as to claim in several articles published in popular magazines read by firearms enthusiasts that the current restrictive legislation being proposed by the U.S. government is modeled on a gun-control statute enacted by Germany’s National Socialist government: the German Weapons Law (Waffengesetz) of March 18, 1938.

Again, one can understand the motivation of the JPFO. Many non-Jewish firearms owners are well aware that the movement to restrict their rights is led and promoted primarily by Jews, and anti-Jewish feeling has been growing among them. They know that the controlled news media, which are almost unanimously in favor of abridging or abolishing the Second Amendment, are very much under the influence of Jews, and they know that the most vocal anti-gun legislators in the Congress also are Jews. It is natural for a group such as the JPFO to mount a damage-control effort and attempt to prevent anti-Jewish feeling from becoming even stronger among gun owners. Their strategy is to deflect the blame from their kinsmen in the media and the government and direct it onto their most hated enemies, the National Socialists — or at least to create enough smoke to obscure the facts and keep the gun-owning public confused.

Unfortunately for those who would like to link Hitler and the National Socialists with gun control, the entire premise for such an effort is false. German firearms legislation under Hitler, far from banning private ownership, actually facilitated the keeping and bearing of arms by German citizens by eliminating or ameliorating restrictive laws which had been enacted by the government preceding his: a left-center government, which had contained a number of Jews.

It is not just that the National Socialist firearms legislation was the opposite of what it has been claimed to have been by persons who want to tar modern gun-grabbers with the “Nazi” brush: the whole spirit of Hitler’s government was starkly different from its portrayal by America’s mass media. The facts, in brief, are these:

  • The National Socialist government of Germany, unlike the government in Washington today, did not fear its citizens. Adolf Hitler was the most popular leader Germany has ever had. Unlike American presidents, he did not have to wear body armor and have shields or bulletproof glass in front of him whenever he spoke in public. At public celebrations he rode standing in an open car as it moved slowly through cheering crowds. Communists made several attempts to assassinate him, and his government stamped down hard on Communism, virtually wiping it out in Germany. Between upright, law-abiding German citizens and Adolf Hitler, however, there was a real love affair, with mutual trust and respect.
  • The spirit of National Socialism was one of manliness, and individual self-defense and self- reliance were central to the National Socialist view of the way a citizen should behave. The notion of banning firearms ownership was utterly alien to National Socialism. In the German universities, where National Socialism gained its earliest footholds and which later became its strongest bastions, dueling was an accepted practice. Although the liberal-Jewish governments in Germany after the First World War attempted to ban dueling, it persisted illegally until it was again legalized by the National Socialists. Fencing, target shooting, and other martial arts were immensely popular in Germany, and the National Socialists encouraged young Germans to become proficient in these activities, believing that they were important for the development of a man’s character.
  • Gun registration and licensing (for long guns as well as for handguns) were legislated by an anti-National Socialist government in Germany in 1928, five years before the National Socialists gained power. Hitler became Chancellor on January 30, 1933. Five years later his government got around to rewriting the gun law enacted a decade earlier by his predecessors, substantially ameliorating it in the process (for example, long guns were exempted from the requirement for a purchase permit; the legal age for gun ownership was lowered from 20 to 18 years; the period of validity of a permit to carry weapons was extended from one to three years; and provisions restricting the amount of ammunition or the number of firearms an individual could own were dropped). Hitler’s government may be criticized for leaving certain restrictions and licensing requirements in the law, but the National Socialists had no intention of preventing law-abiding Germans from keeping or bearing arms. Again, the firearms law enacted by Hitler’s government enhanced the rights of Germans to keep and bear arms; no new restrictions were added, and many pre-existing restrictions were relaxed or eliminated.
  • At the end of the Second World War, American GIs in the occupying force were astounded to discover how many German civilians owned private firearms. Tens of thousands of pistols looted from German homes by GIs were brought back to the United States after the war. In 1945 General Eisenhower ordered all privately owned firearms in the American occupation zone of Germany confiscated, and Germans were required to hand in their shotguns and rifles as well as any handguns which had not already been stolen. In the Soviet occupation zone German civilians were summarily shot if they were found in possession of even a single cartridge.
  • Jews, it should be noted, were not Germans, even if they had been born in Germany. The National Socialists defined citizenship in ethnic terms, and under Hitler Jews were not accorded full rights of citizenship. National Socialist legislation progressively excluded Jews from key professions: teaching, the media, the practice of law, etc. The aim was not only to free German life from an oppressive and degenerative Jewish influence, but to persuade Jews to emigrate. The German Weapons Law of March 18, 1938, specifically excluded Jews from manufacturing or dealing in firearms or munitions, but it did not exclude them from owning or bearing personal firearms. The exclusion of Jews from the firearms business rankled them as much as any other exclusion, and in their typically ethnocentric fashion they have misrepresented the law involved as an anti-gun law in an effort to cast their enemies in a bad light.

It should be noted in passing that the restrictions placed on Jews by the National Socialists had the intended effect: between 1933 and 1939 two-thirds of the Jews residing in Germany emigrated, reducing the Jewish population of the country from 600,000 when Hitler became Chancellor in 1933 to 200,000 at the outbreak of the Second World War in 1939. Jews in the United States, looking at this period from their own narrowly focused viewpoint, have described these peacetime years of the National Socialist government as a time of darkness, terror and regression, whereas for the German people it was a time of hope, joy, and spiritual and material renewal.

Much the same type of distortion is seen in the portrayal of the United States in the early 1950s: the so-called “McCarthy Era.” Senator Joseph McCarthy (Republican, Wisconsin) used his position as chairman of the Senate’s Government Operations Committee to expose the widespread Communist infiltration of the U.S. government and other U.S. institutions which had taken place during the Second World War. A substantial majority of the Communists who were dragged reluctantly out into the light of day by his efforts were Jews. As a result, the controlled media always have portrayed the period as one of terror and repression, when everyone was frightened of Senator McCarthy’s “witch hunt.” Of course, it was nothing of the sort to non-Jewish Americans, who were not intimidated in the least. History viewed through a Jewish lens — i.e., through media controlled by Jews — always is distorted in a way corresponding to Jewish interests and concerns.

[To understand the significance of the German Weapons Law of March 18, 1938, enacted by the National Socialists, and the Law on Firearms and Ammunition of April 12, 1928, which was enacted by an anti-National Socialist government, a little background information first may help the reader.]

After Germany’s defeat in the First World War (a defeat in which Germany’s Jews played no small part, demoralizing the home front with demonstrations and other subversive activity, much as they did in America during the Vietnam war), the Kaiser abdicated, and liberals and leftists seized control of the government in 1918. Hitler, recovering in a military hospital from a British poison-gas attack which had blinded him temporarily, made the decision to go into politics and fight against the traitors he felt were responsible for Germany’s distress.

The tendency of Germany’s new rulers after the First World War was much the same as it is for the liberals in America today: they promoted cosmopolitanism, internationalism and egalitarianism. By 1923 economic conditions in Germany had become catastrophic, and there was much public unrest. The Communists had made major inroads into the labor movement and were a growing threat to the country.

Hitler had indeed gone into politics, and his National Socialists battled the Communists in the streets of Germany’s cities and gradually came to be seen by many patriotic Germans in the working class and the middle class as the only force which could save Germany from a Communist takeover and total ruin. Hitler’s National Socialists continued to win recruits and gain strength during the 1920s. The Communists, with aid from the Soviet Union, also continued to grow. The political situation became increasingly unstable, as the government lost popular support.

The government’s response was to substantially tighten up restrictions on the rights of German citizens to keep and bear arms. The Law on Firearms and Ammunition of April 12, 1928, was the most substantial effort in this regard. This law was enacted by a left-center government hostile to the National Socialists (the government was headed by Chancellor Wilhelm Marx and consisted of a coalition of Socialists, including many Jews and Catholic Centrists).

Five years later, in 1933, the National Socialists were in power, Hitler headed the government, and the Communist threat was crushed decisively. The National Socialists began undoing the social and economic damage done by their predecessors. Germany was restored to full employment, degeneracy and corruption were rooted out, Jews and their collaborators were removed from one facet of national life after another, and the German people entered a new era of national freedom, health, and prosperity.

Finally, in 1938, the National Socialist government got around to enacting a new firearms law to replace the one enacted by their opponents ten years earlier. The highlights of the 1938 law, especially as it applied to ordinary citizens, rather than manufacturers or dealers, follow:

  • Handguns may be purchased only on submission of a Weapons Acquisition Permit(Waffenerwerbschein), which must be used within one year from the date of issue. Muzzle- loading handguns are exempted from the permit requirement. [The 1928 law had required a permit for the purchase of long guns as well, but the National Socialists dropped this requirement.]
  • Holders of a permit to carry weapons (Waffenschein) or of a hunting license do not need a Weapons Acquisition Permit in order to acquire a handgun.
  • A hunting license authorizes its bearer to carry hunting weapons and handguns.
  • Firearms and ammunition, as well as swords and knives, may not be sold to minors under the age of 18 years. [The age limit had been 20 years in the 1928 law.]
  • Whoever carries a firearm outside of his dwelling, his place of employment, his place of business, or his fenced property must have on his person a Weapons Permit (Waffenschein). A permit is not required, however, for carrying a firearm for use at a police-approved shooting range.
  • A permit to acquire a handgun or to carry firearms may only be issued to persons whose trustworthiness is not in question and who can show a need for a permit. In particular, a permit may not be issued to:
    1. persons under the age of 18 years;
    2. legally incompetent or mentally retarded persons;
    3. Gypsies or vagabonds;
    4. persons under mandatory police supervision [i.e., on parole] or otherwise temporarily without civil rights;
    5. persons convicted of treason or high treason or known to be engaged in activities hostile to the state;
    6. persons who for assault, trespass, a breach of the peace, resistance to authority, a criminal offense or misdemeanor, or a hunting or fishing violation were legally sentenced to a term of imprisonment of more than two weeks, if three years have not passed since the term of imprisonment.
  • The manufacture, sale, carrying, possession, and import of the following are prohibited:
    1. “trick” firearms, designed so as to conceal their function (e.g., cane guns and belt-buckle pistols);
    2. any firearm equipped with a silencer and any rifle equipped with a spotlight;
    3. cartridges with .22 caliber, hollow-point bullets.

That is the essence. Numerous other provisions of the law relate to firearms manufacturers, importers and dealers; to acquisition and carrying of firearms by police, military and other official personnel; to the maximum fees which can be charged for permits (3 Reichsmark); to tourists bringing firearms into Germany; and to the fines and other penalties to be levied for violations.

The requirements of “trustworthiness” and of proof of need when obtaining a permit are troubling, but it should be noted that they were simply carried over from the 1928 law: they were not formulated by the National Socialists. Under the National Socialists these requirements were interpreted liberally: a person who did not fall into one of the prohibited categories listed above was considered trustworthy, and a statement such as, “I often carry sums of money,” was accepted as proof of need.

The prohibitions of spotlight-equipped rifles and hollow-point .22 caliber ammunition were based on considerations that the former were unsporting when used for hunting, and the latter were inhumane.

The German firearms laws were published by the German government in the Reichsgesetzblatt. The most pertinent part of the National Socialist Firearms Law — the part pertaining to the purchase, ownership, and carrying of firearms by private citizens — is Part IV of the Law. Two separate and distinct types of permits are referred to: a Weapons Acquisition Permit (Waffenerwerbschein), required only for purchasing a handgun; and a Weapons Permit (Waffenschein),required for carrying any firearm in public. Interestingly enough, as also mentioned above, a hunting license could take the place of both these permits.

When you [consider the National Socialist law and that which preceded it], you will understand that it was Hitler’s enemies, not Hitler, who should be compared with the gun-control advocates in America today. Then as now it was the Jews, not the National Socialists, who wanted the people’s right of self-defense restricted. You will understand that those who continue to make the claim that Hitler was a gun-grabber are either ignorant or dishonest.

And you will understand that it was not until 1945, when the Communist and democratic victors of the Second World War had installed occupation governments to rule over the conquered Germans that German citizens were finally and completely denied the right to armed self-defense.

gun-control-in-germany-1928-1945

Original Article