Category Archives: White Racial (Christian) Identity

The Andrew Carrington Hitchcock Show – 22 Feb 2016

Satan's 6 pointed star.

Satan’s 6 pointed star.

Last Friday night I did a pre-recorded show with Andrew Carrington Hitchcock. We discussed a variety of topics, including a few of the latest posts/articles from my other site:

ETPNewBackground2

Andrew’s shows are available for download from his site & also from Euro Folk Radio.

Download Show

For those not familiar with Andy’s work, I’d suggest getting these two books:

TheSynagogueOfSatan

And:

In-the-name-of-Yahweh

– White Racial I.D Admin (or BDL1983)

The Germanic Tribes Of Israel

From Aryan Israel:

King Aeneas escapes the devastation of Troy.

King Aeneas escapes the devastation of Troy.

Ancient Britons and Proto-Celts

Britain gets it’s name from King Brutus, the grandson of King Aeneas, who was the founder of the Roman Empire. Prince Brutus arrived on ‘the great white island’ with a large group of his fellow Trojans escaping the devastation of Troy, and was recognised and welcomed by three tribes of his Aryan Shemitic brethren that were already here, and who proceeded to proclaim him King of the entire island. Brutus founded the city of Caer Troia (New Troy) on the Thames, which later became known as ‘Londinium’ by the Romans. The Welsh Bruts give the date as being when the Philistines of the Old Testament held the ark of the Covenant in captivity and when Beli was the high priest of Judah, both of which are mentioned in the Book of 1 Samuel. A commemorative stone of where he first set foot on the island has stood at Totnes in Devon since 1100 BC. These people became known as the Ancient Britons and would later be absorbed into the Celts, Gauls and Saxons who also have their origins in the tribes of Jacob-Israel.

Previous to King Brutus arriving in Britain, his ancestor King Cecrops (Calcol/Calchol) had begun the Irish dynasty of Kings at Ulster around 1700 BC. He also founded Athens and was at the head of all the kingly lines in Europe, owing to him being one of the sons of Zarah, who was the son of Judah, the patriarch of the same tribe from which King David and Jesus the Christ were descended. He was almost as wise as Solomon according to the biblical record, and had a brother called Darda (also known as Dardanus and Dara) who founded Troy and whose descendants ruled there until the destruction of it, when the last son of the Kingly line and grandfather of King Brutus, King Aeneas, married the daughter of Latinus and started off the Roman empire. King Cecrops, the ancestor of all today’s Kingly bloodlines was said to have left Egypt before the famous exodus and we have records of his descendants spreading west along the Mediterranean, leaving clearly Hebrew names to the places they colonised, like the Ebro valley, the river Iber and Saragossa (stronghold of Zarah) in Spain. They became known to history as the Iberians and also gave their name to Ireland, first being Iberne, then Erne, then latinised to Hibernia.

Later, there was another wave of Hebrew colonists escaping the Egyptian tyranny. The classical writers and historians Heraceteus of Abdere 600 BC, Dioderus Siculis 50 BC, Euripedes 440 BC and Strabo 44 BC, all make reference to large groups of Hebrew settlers leaving Egypt just before Moses led the remainder away in the Exodus. They were from the tribe of Dan and settled Argos, the oldest city in Greece and became known as the Danaii, eventually being forced from there and ending up in Ireland as the Tuattha de Danaan.

The Bible just records the exploits of the Israelites who settled in the Levant, but there is a wealth of evidence elsewhere to show that the Trojans, Spartans, Dorians, Lacedaemonians, Achaeans, Minoans and Danaans all descended from the common root of Shem, son of Noah, through the tribe whom God made his covenant with, the House of Isaac.

There were many promises given to Abraham and his son Isaac in the Old Testament and there is only one group of people today that these promises have have come true for. Likewise there are many prophecies that have only come true for one particular group of nations. Apostate church history would have us believe that ten of the tribes of Israel just disappeared from history, mingling into the heathen tribes around them. Yet there is plenty of proof that they survived, fulfilled the prophesies and gained the fruit of God’s promise as today’s nations of Europe.

Areas that the ten tribes were removed to in red, Judah and Benjamin in green.

Areas that the ten tribes were removed to in red, Judah and Benjamin in green.

The Dispersion and Evolution of the Tribes

Round about 740 BC the Assyrian King Sargon II invaded the reclaimed land of Canaan that had been rightfully settled by the Israelite tribes, defeating them and transporting the tribes from there to different parts of the Assyrian empire, mainly to the east under the Caspian Sea, and to the north west of Nineveh. This was God’s punishment of the reprobate tribes of Israel, who had refused to keep themselves separate from the ways and peoples that surrounded them. It was Assyrian practice to place their captives on the edges of the empire to act as a buffer zone against invaders. They had freedom of movement, but had to pay tribute and were not allowed to make their own laws. Later, around 600 BC the Babylonians burnt Jerusalem to the ground and took the last remaining people of the tribes of Judah and Benjamin to Babylon, where they stayed in captivity until King Cyrus released them around 540 BC. These two tribes were able to recover some of their history at that time and it is through them and those culturally descended from them, that the Bible was preserved for us today. However the other ten tribes have a completely different history after their captivity and they never returned to Palestine.

We know the tribes of Israel by the name ‘Israelites’ from the Bible, but it is unlikely that was the name that they called themselves by, and even more unlikely that it was the name other peoples called them. The Assyrians knew them by the name of their king ‘Omri’ and called them the Khomri or Ghomri. After about 705 BC that name doesn’t get mentioned again in the records, but instead a new name appears, the Gimira or Gamera, recorded in Assyrian letters of the time as a people living in the exact area that the Old Testament says the Israelites had been placed in, near the beginning of the Euphrates.

This group took council and decided to cross the river and search for a new land in which to dwell, as told in 2 Esdras ch 13 v 39 – 45. About this time we first hear of the Cimmerians being mentioned by Strabo as also being in the same place that 2 Esdras records the Israelites as being in. Strabo tells us that these Cimmerians (Khomri – Gimira – Cimmerian) crossed the river and went on to invade Phrygia and Lydia (modern Greece) until they were pushed further westward by the Scythians around 525 BC.

These Scythian tribes also had their origin in Israel. They were the Israelites that were placed to the east under the Caspian sea and were called ‘Iskuza’ by the Assyrians (derived from Isaaca)  Saka/Sakka by the Persians and Shutae by the Greeks. They spread from east to west under the Caspian sea, pushing their Cimmerian brothers further west into Europe, while at the same time moving east into India, becoming known to history as Western Scythians and Eastern Scythians. The eastern branch travelled as far as China and introduced Buddhism to them. Some of the titles for Guatama Buddha showed his Scythian heritage, such as Sakyashina – lion of the tribe of Sakya, Sakyamuni – Sakya sage, Sugata – Happy One and Sakya – the teacher. The western Scythians travelled through the Caucasus mountains into Europe where they occupied south Russia. They became known as the Massagetae – the great Sakka horde, or just Sakka.

Migration of the tribes at the time of Moses and up to the Assyrian dispersion in green, after that in red.

Migration of the tribes at the time of Moses and up to the Assyrian dispersion in green, after that in red.

As The Cimmerians moved west they became known as Celts by the Greeks and Gauls by the Romans. They followed the Danube river (named after the tribe of Dan in the previous dispersion at the time of Moses), leaving burial mounds behind them in the same manner as the Scythian ones, filled with swords, ornaments, animals and even servants/slaves. This is known as the Hallstatt culture today and we can still see our link to them in the traces left behind of the settlements they built, which were in a similar style to our modern rural ones. By 300 BC Europe was full of Celts and Gauls and some invaded Rome while others pushed back east. The eastern ones founded ‘Galatia’ and became the Galatians whom Saint Paul wrote his epistle to, while the western ones repeatedly attacked Rome.

As the Scythians made their way further west from the land that had by now been named after them, they became known as Germani, or genuine, to differentiate them from a Japhetite tribe called the Sarmatians that were now occupying their previous homeland. Some of these German tribes became known as Angles and Saxons and pushed across the channel into Britain, where they found people just like them from the earlier migrations. Other tribes colonised Scandinavia, tracing their kingly line from Odin in 200 AD, whose genealogy also takes us back to the tribe of Judah and the House of Isaac.

Sharing similar language and having a similar culture, these various tribes were able to soon assimilate after first fighting one another – intermarrying and forming ties to the land, building rural farming communities and instituting the rule of Law. The language they spoke was Paleo-Hebrew and this can clearly be seen when comparing Hebrew words to modern English and ancient Welsh.

Read More

Rejecting Rainbow Nationalism

I did a show with Bill Finck and Mike Delaney on Sunday morning (my time) about the fags and the problems they bless us with. These are Bill’s show notes:

Christogenea

William Finck has posted his program notes with pertinent links at the Christogenea Forum under the same title, found here: Rejecting Rainbow Nationalism.

GayKlansmen

Mike Delaney of Prothink.org and Trutube.tv and Brett Light of ExpeltheParasite.com and White Racial Identity.net join William Finck for a discussion on Rainbow Nationalism, and why White Nationalists, and especially Christian Nationalists, must reject these failures and victims of the Jewish agenda and Jewish Pop Culture.

Download Show

The show went well and we did our best to make things interesting! I enjoyed doing the show and I hope you enjoy listening!

(I had to post this on both of my sites because it makes sense to. Normally I don’t like double posting, but whatever…)

– White Racial I.D. Admin

The National Socialist Christian Crusaders Came To Fight Godless Communists!

Here is an interesting article which appeared in the Daily Mail back in 2011. It pretty much says it all in the title – Christian crusaders versus Godless Communists. That was the reality of National Socialist Germany versus Soviet Russia; and it this eternal battle between Yahweh’s children and Satan’s mongrel children which still rages on today. It is only the circumstance and shape that the battle takes which changes. The participants and ideals involved remain the same.

From The Daily Mail:

An extraordinary secret archive has revealed for the first time how thousands of Soviet citizens collaborated with Nazi invaders during World War II.

The cache of documents, some retrieved from the files of the KGB, shows how many viewed the Germans as Christian liberators – and their own masters as godless Communists.

This view was reinforced when the soldiers of the Third Reich opened up 470 churches in north-western Russia alone and reinstated priests driven from their pulpits by Stalin.

In turn, the clergy co-operated closely with S.S. death squads in betraying Communist officials, Jews and partisan resistance groups.

We, the Allied Nations of Christendom should have supported Hitler, but instead supported the Soviet Communists.

We, the Allied Nations of Christendom should have supported Hitler, but instead supported the Soviet Communists. Now we are reaping what we’ve sown – I.e. the destruction of our formerly White homelands.

Perhaps most astonishingly, the Germans even shipped numerous mayors, journalists, policeman and teachers back to the Reich to show them the ‘German way of life.’

Russia has always portrayed the war against the Germans as a historic struggle which cost 27 million lives but ultimately defeated the Nazis forever.

Until now, there has been little examination of the extent of collaboration by Soviet citizens with the invaders.

Read More

Thanks go to Bill Finck’s Twitter account for finding this article!

– White Racial I.D. Admin

Matthew Chapter 13 – The Wheat And The Tares

ChristSwastika

This radio show is a good one to listen to in conjunction with the Deuteronomy 24:2 showUnderstanding the Parable of the Wheat and the Tares is an essential Biblical lesson and well worth repeating here:

Matthew 13:24-30 (The Parable)

24 Another parable put he forth unto them, saying, The kingdom of heaven is likened unto a man which sowed good seed in his field:
25 But while men slept, his enemy came and sowed tares among the wheat, and went his way.
26 But when the blade was sprung up, and brought forth fruit, then appeared the tares also.
27 So the servants of the householder came and said unto him, Sir, didst not thou sow good seed in thy field? from whence then hath it tares?
28 He said unto them, An enemy hath done this. The servants said unto him, Wilt thou then that we go and gather them up?
29 But he said, Nay; lest while ye gather up the tares, ye root up also the wheat with them.
30 Let both grow together until the harvest: and in the time of harvest I will say to the reapers,Gather ye together first the tares, and bind them in bundles to burn them: but gather the wheat into my barn.

Matthew 13:36-43 (The Explanation)

36 Then Jesus sent the multitude away, and went into the house: and his disciples came unto him, saying, Declare unto us the parable of the tares of the field.
37 He answered and said unto them, He that soweth the good seed is the Son of man;
38 The field is the world; the good seed are the children of the kingdom; but the tares are the children of the wicked one;
39 The enemy that sowed them is the devil; the harvest is the end of the world; and the reapers are the angels.
40 As therefore the tares are gathered and burned in the fire; so shall it be in the end of this world.
41 The Son of man shall send forth his angels, and they shall gather out of his kingdom all things that offend, and them which do iniquity;
42 And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth.
43 Then shall the righteous shine forth as the sun in the kingdom of their Father. Who hath ears to hear, let him hear.

Download Show

Christogenea Show Notes

Deuteronomy 23:2 – No Bastards Shall Enter The Congregation

Christogenea

This radio show explains in no uncertain terms what Deuteronomy 23:2 is all about. It is clear, concise, and indisputable.

Deuteronomy 23:2 – A bastard shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD; even to his tenth generation shall he not enter into the congregation of the LORD.

And that doesn’t mean someone from a bastardized bloodline becomes pure again in the eleventh generation. No. Once a bloodline is corrupt it remains corrupt forever, and can never be ‘re-purified’. There are no stricter blood purity laws than those in the Bible, since it is either 100% or 0%, pure or impure. There are no third options or grey areas.

Download Show

Bill’s show notes and scripture verses can be found here.

The Fallacy of Evolutionary Theory

No. This is not how things happen.

No. This is not how things happen.

The subject of evolution is one that needs addressing because far too many people, including many supposedly ‘awakened’ people, believe in it. They believe in it because it is dressed up as science and it is taught in schools and universities as fact. Add to that, the endless David Attenborough documentaries on the television, and there you go. That’s why most people, including a large percentage of ‘White Nationalists’, believe in this Jewish lie of ‘evolution’. In reality, evolutionary theory is a trick played upon people’s minds and imaginations. It is indeed a deception, and one that I used to believe in. Therefore, I understand the thought process from the point of view of a believer. Now I’m going to pick it to shreds!

How ‘Evolutionary Theory’ Is Supposed To Work

The basic premise is that all life as we know it evolved from a single cell. The cell then divided itself and began multiplying until there were many more cells. Single celled organisms then began combining with other cells producing more complex lifeforms. Keep in mind that this is supposedly what was happening on earth 4.5 billion years ago. The complexity and number of lifeforms kept on increasing as time went on, until we have what we have today – countless different species all inhabiting the earth, interdependent on each other. OK, so it sounds like a reasonable theory given the time frame we are dealing with. 4.5 billion years is such a long period of time that almost anything could have evolved out of the original lifeforms. The differences in species are all a result of genetic mutations, which happened to work out favourably. The stronger, more adaptable species survived and prospered, gaining many more favourable genetic enhancements over time.

That is the basic scope of macro-evolutionary theory. There are of course many ‘scientists’ out there who tweak certain details and have their own ideas about what to insert into their version of the theory, but in order that the trees should not block out the forest, it is best to analyse the way the theory works, and not get caught up on minor details.

The ‘Evidence’ Presented To Prove ‘Evolutionary Theory’

The only evidence used to support macro-evolution as an idea, is what they have termed micro-evolution. This is where the dirty little trick lies! See, what they call micro-evolution is really only the adaption of species, and of course there is plenty of evidence supporting the idea that a species adapts to its environment and the strongest, best suited survive, while the weaker defectives die off. I would have thought the adaption process of a species to be plainly obvious, since every species lives in an environment and of course it will adapt. Certain genetic traits which favour the best and brightest of the species are bound to come to the fore, if nature is allowed to take its course, and the defective, less useful traits become less common. This is why eugenics is a good idea and it works for people, as well as cattle. (Cattle breeding programs are a great example of how you can breed a species for certain traits) Note that the adaption of species is not driven by genetic mutations, rather it is simply the natural weeding out of crap genes and a concentration of the good genes already present in the species!

The Concept Of Species Or ‘Kind’

This is an area where evolutionists have all sorts of trouble. They cannot accurately define the concept, and in fact, given that they believe all organisms and all species are in transitional mutation mode, all the time; the very concept of any distinct kind is blurred. If all the lines between what constitutes a kind are blurred, then there is no rational or moral basis with which you can justify preserving any kind. This is something to think about if you are a White Nationalist, because evolutionary theory invalidates the entire idea of preserving your kind. If Whites have a common ancestor with every other race and creature on earth, then why would you care if whites died out, and at what point would someone be white enough? We would re-evolve in a couple billion years time anyway, since it happened once before, right?

Also, in lock step with the marxists; the evolutionists will insist that all races of ‘humans’ are the same species or kind, yet if an evolutionist points to a small adaptational difference in the beak of some particular bird, then that apparently constitutes a different species! This is what is called ‘playing‘ with the definition of species/kind.

That's why it requires a 'leap of faith'!

That’s why it requires a ‘leap of faith’!

The Leap Of Faith

Evolutionists never believe that their idea could be wrong because of the ‘oh, it’s science‘ factor. The only scientific thing about evolutionary theory is the adaption of species explained above, which isn’t evolution anyway, and in no way does it affirm macro-evolution!

The Leap of Faith for evolutionists is rather bizarre when broken down into its components: 1.) They rightly accept the incorrectly termed micro-evolution (adaption of species) as fact, then 2.) They add 4.5 billion years or so to the equation, a conjectural figure to say the least, but beside the point, then 3.) they add to the mix the idea of gene mutation as the driving factor behind the existence of different species, and now macro-evolution must be true? Really? They go from adaptation of species, where every species only adapts according to what is in its natural genetic code, to mutant theory. That is not what ‘micro-evolution’ proves in any way, shape or form, and macro-evolution is therefore a religious belief!

Genetic Mutation Is Needed For The Theory To ‘Work’

Without the idea of genetic mutation driving evolution, it is impossible to get different species in the first place if there was only one cell. That is why it is the central pillar behind macro-evolutionary theory. If you have a whole bunch of different creatures, then the only way of explaining the gap from one creature to another, is to insist that it happened as a result of gene mutation. The only way they can get away with such ridiculous speculation and pass it off as proven science, is by emphasizing the 4.5 billion year time frame, and that is of course, what they do. People’s imaginations take over when pondering such vast amounts of time and that’s when the gullibility factor rises to the fore. They will insist that gene mutation ‘evolution’ occurs at such a slow rate, that it isn’t measurable if you just look at recent times – rather convenient, wouldn’t you say!

No. These transitional missing links don't exist.

No. These transitional missing links don’t exist.

Missing Links

The complete absence of ‘missing links’ from the fossil record is another stumbling block for evolutionists. If all life came from one cell, then we are all related. You could pick any two lifeforms on earth and somewhere back in the past there should be a common ancestor, known as a ‘missing link’. Because none of these missing links actually exist, they are forced to point to creatures that died out a long time ago – and specifically, ones that happen to resemble a couple of creatures still alive today. Since the ancient creature died out, no-one will find them alive today and burst the bubble, so the evolutionist can insist that it is a missing link of the two. Most of their attempts to find missing links are fairly half-hearted and speculative, to say the least. Add to this, the divergent lines which should be traceable in the fossil record between any missing link and whatever two modern creatures allegedly evolved from it. Unfortunately for evolutionists, no such diverging and gradually mutating lines exist, therefore the theory is bunk. If it were true, the fossil record would tell the story.

Marxism

Evolutionary Theory and Marxism

The link between evolutionary theory and Marxism is one that not many White Nationalists seem to notice, although it is actually quite obvious when you break it down. Now, Darwin wasn’t a Jew, but his work in trying to scientifically prove macro-evolution sure did give the Jews a ‘scientific front’ for this updated version of the primordial ooze theory. Natural selection and adaption of species are not the same thing as gene mutating macro-evolution, and that’s what Darwin found out himself by providing evidence for the first two and then banging his head against a brick wall looking for proof of kinds mutating into different kinds.

Marxists all have a fundamental belief that there is no such thing as race, and even if there is, then it is all a result of environmental factors. They believe that because we all evolved from one common ancestor back in Africa, that therefore racial discrimination isn’t warranted because we are all the same if you go back far enough. The difference is only skin-deep, they tend to say. Now, how are the Marxists justifying their opposition to the recognition of the reality of race? By using evolutionary theory! Evolutionary theory justifies the Marxist position, because it, like Marxism, fundamentally espouses a belief that it was only the environment which was responsible for different organisms evolving differently. Think about this: if life came about as a result of one cell, with no creative designing force in the world, then the environment has to be the only factor which caused all life to turn into what it is! Evolutionary theory is probably more Marxist than Marxism, and we all know how much trouble we get in when we embrace the false Marxist dialectic of oppressor and oppressed!

White Nationalist’s Who Believe In Evolutionary Theory

Most White Nationalists of this mindset are determined to be narrow-minded and defend their evolutionary delusions at any cost. As a result, they insist that Whites evolved in the freezing ice-age conditions of Northern Europe, then ignore the fact that they didn’t leave any infrastructure behind them, which would have indicated their presence. The strangest thing about this belief, apart from it being insane, is that if you were a creature capable of surviving ice-age Northern Europe without infrastructure necessary for warmth and sustaining population, then surely you’d be smart enough to look for sunnier pastures somewhere else? Why would the White man sit there freezing and not go exploring for more fertile grounds? It doesn’t make any sense, to put it mildly, and this from the most evolved race of all? These sorts of White Nationalists will also insist that Whites have built civilizations everywhere except for the land of Ancient Israel and Judah. Why? Because if they considered the possibility that the Israelites were White, it’d lend credence to what’s in the Bible, and that goes directly against evolutionary theory!

Further food for thought: if you believe in evolution, then you believe that somewhere way back there is a missing link common ancestor of both whites and negroes. There has to be, according to the theory. If I were to make a guess I’d say that this missing link would look like some sort of coffee-coloured nearly-man. Now, how can anyone reconcile the idea of this coffee-coloured nearly-man spawning both pitch black negoes and lily white Nordics, with reality? Because this scenario is nuttier than a trip to a nut factory; there is only one answer – they will say that blacks got blacker because of the hot sun in Africa, whilst the Nordics turned white due to lack of sun in Northern Europe. They will also say that Africa was a land of plenty so the blacks developed dumb and lazy, and Europe was a harsh climate so whites developed their survival capabilities that way. Whilst environment obviously does affect racial development to a certain limited extent, the evolutionist will try and tell you that it was only the environment that led the two divergent spawns of the coffee-coloured nearly-man to evolve completely differently, and against genetic logic. According to the evolutionist logic, if you stuck a bunch of negroes in Scandinavia (which the Jews are currently doing) and gave them a few thousand years, they would likely evolve white! What nonsense! If that were true, then why haven’t Eskimos evolved into super-Nordics? This is a case of the marxist-evolutionist-environmental-theory applied to race, without a doubt.

Biblical Law Of Species/Kind

I’ve heard it said that the best truths are usually kept simple. The Biblical Law of kind after kind is one such truth. It is as simple as it gets, and it is 100% reliable. If you get the male and female of any one kind to reproduce – what do you get? Another of the same kind! It doesn’t say ‘kind gradually begets another kind’ or ‘kind slowly but surely morphs into something else’ – and that’s because they don’t. Unfortunately for modern society, the Bible is viewed as unscientific, so people pay no attention to this obvious and natural law, instead preferring the genetic mutant theory.

DNA - it doesn't need to be tampered with.

DNA – it doesn’t need to be tampered with.

DNA Structure And The Complexity Of Species

The fact that DNA is such an incredibly complex blueprint for each and every species, certainly points to an intelligent designer. It is the code for building each species and each part of the code exists for a specific purpose. Therefore, one part of the code cannot exist without the other bits already being there. For example, the eye has a pupil and it also has an optic nerve. Without a pupil, the optic nerve would not serve any purpose, and vice versa. So to say that all the interdependent parts of any species would just evolve and all the bits somehow fit together with no guidance or ‘planned end-product‘, is quite simply a joke.

Genetic Mutation Is Not A Good Thing

I find it surprising that more people can’t work this out. A genetic mutation in your cells is a corruption, and it usually results in a tumour or a cancer. There are no known cases of any good genetic mutations, except for the ones dreamed up in the evolutionist’s head. Down Syndrome, cancer, and any number of genetic problems spring to mind, all of which, are disastrous and deadly. Nature doesn’t appreciate the genetically corrupted individual in any species and usually they have great trouble reproducing (and I’m not talking about idiot welfare ‘whites’ of low stock, by the way). Even if it were possible to get a positive genetic mutation, what are the chances of finding an appropriate partner who will pass the gene on? The species in question would have to form a kind of ‘group mutation club‘, with the power of telepathically working out what sort of mutations everyone else is planning to pass on!

Intelligent Design

The alternative to the theory of evolution is the fact of nature that kind begets more it’s own kind. For this reason, I believe that all pure species/kinds were created by an intelligent designer, or God, if you like. I do not claim to know the mechanisms of how the Creator did this great work of creation, although he clearly did do it or we wouldn’t be here. You can’t get something out of nothing, without creative energy – this is the Creators domain, not ours to comprehend.

Purity is crucial and the Swastika symbolizes it well!

Purity is crucial and the Swastika symbolizes it well!

Purity Versus Hybridization

All lifeforms on earth fall in one of two categories; they are either pure creations or they are a mixed hybrid. The hybrid is created only of this earth, and is not one of the Creator’s designs. Therefore any mixed person cannot possess the spirit of the Almighty. Purity is the ideal state for all species, and hybridization is ultimately what brings evil into the world – I.e. the Jews.

The Jewish Motive For Pushing Evolution

Apart from the fact that ‘evolution’ is really just the environmental theory of marxism repackaged to deal with life and nature, rather than history and politics; there are other motives as to why the Jews sell us this bogus idea. A huge part of this is because they know who we are. The Jews know that WE (Whites) are the Adamic race of Yahweh in the Bible, and that THEY are the children and dedicated servants of Satan. They understand this, while we don’t, at this point in time. The job of evolutionary theory is to try and discredit the Bible in the eyes of White Adamic people. The consequence of this is that we lose any sense of ourselves as a special creative elect. Once our identity is lost, then we become just another lifeform that evolved from the slime – exactly what the Jews want us to think, and exactly where we’ll end up if we don’t wake up to who we truly are!

Who’s Religious?

I don’t accept things based upon blind-faith and I never will. It takes time to analyse and think through all of these concepts and to sift through the information. When I first worked all this stuff out regarding the Bible and how evolutionary theory is used destructively against us, I was very surprised, to say the least. I am absolutely certain that the Bible is correct about the nature of species and their origins. The ‘how‘ mechanism of creation is not explained in the Bible because we, as the Creators products, can never be on that higher level. It’s beyond our comprehension. What can be established for sure, is that ‘kind after kind’ makes far more sense than evolutionary theory, and it is demonstrably observable in reality! The evolutionists BELIEVE in something that has never been observed or proven to have happened, yet apparently if you adhere to ‘kind after kind’ from the Bible, it is a religious act of blind faith.

The Joke’s on them!

HitlerGottMitUns

– White Racial I.D. Admin

The Evil Jews Hate Christ – It’s in their Satanic Blood

If you are unaware of the fact that the Jews are NOT God’s Chosen People, but in fact hate Christ and are the children of the devil – then these two short videos might help:

The real identity of the Jews and therefore the #1 fact the want to keep concealed from us

The real identity of the Jews and therefore the #1 FACT they want to keep concealed from us!

– White Racial I.D. Admin

White Nationalist Cognitive Dissonance

Christogenea

Secular White Nationalism, meaning White Nationalism that rejects or insists upon being apart from Christianity, seems to have first appeared in America in the late twentieth century with the likes of David Duke and a motley collection of other rejects from what may have been identified rather loosely as the Christian Patriot movement of the 1950’s through the 1980’s. It is not our purpose to dwell on the beginnings of this movement or how it has grown, however we will mention Mr. Duke again here later on and in another context. Our purpose for now is to discuss some of the shortcomings in the world-views of secular White Nationalists in general, and why they will always continue to fail.

Before we begin, however, we must first state that we do not accept denominational Judeo-Christians to be Christians at all. Rather, they have come to worship Jews rather than Jesus, and seek to advance World Jewish Supremacy rather than the Kingdom of God. The Roman Catholic Church was heavily infiltrated by presumably converted Jews and its literature became awash with truly anti-Christian, Jewish ideas from as early as the 14th century. Even the greatest of Protestant scholars such as Martin Luther were poisoned with the writings of Jews such as Lyra and Burgensis in their formal church educations, and the churches they founded retained those Jewish ideas.

The anti-Christian White Nationalists assume that the modern churches represent Christianity, and that is a bad assumption. The denominational churches had long ago been turned to the will of the internationalist merchants, and their policies have long represented the will of the merchants rather than the will of the Christian God. Many of their policies stand in direct contradiction to the Christian Bible, even in spite of the bad translations which most Bible versions have suffered partly due to these same influences. Much of this phenomenon is readily evident in Church history.

From the 1st through the 16th centuries, and in some cases even beyond that, Jews were consistently and properly portrayed by Christians as devils. In Europe through the 18th century, Jews were practically ostracized from the Christian society. Jews were not allowed to hold Christians as slaves, they were barred from inter-marrying with Christians, Christians were not permitted to borrow money at usury, Jews could not hold public office and they were barred from most occupations. However Jews were found to be useful by many greedy kings and others of the noble class who profited by allowing them to operate their vices and who for that reason even protected them from the wrath of their own citizens.

Because they were allowed to operate their usury and their vices, often surreptitiously, and because they were allowed to operate an international trade over which they had almost exclusive control, the Jews became far richer than most White Europeans even of the noble class, and thereby they became influential enough in Europe to subvert it, using the secret societies and their control of the press to launch a revolution by which they forced their own emancipation. With the coming of Napoleon, for the first time in over a thousand years Jews became equal citizens with Christians in Europe.

After the French Revolution, secular humanism would become the new philosophical paradigm of every nation which the Jews were able to subvert. Where Christianity endured, and especially in America, the denominational churches were subverted with Jewish money to conform with doctrines beneficial to Jewish supremacy. The early popularity of the Scofield and Bullinger Bibles and how their influences have come to dominate American Protestantism is one aspect of the result of such Jewish corruption.

Now this short synopsis may be quite simplified, but it is nevertheless true. While White Nationalists have despised Christianity in name, in reality they know nothing of Christianity because the denominational churches have not ever represented or taught Christianity in its proper historical and literary contexts.

Today the only form of Christianity which comes close to being faithful to those contexts is Christian Identity, which developed among early Christian Patriots in the light of the archaeological discoveries of the 18th through the 20th centuries that have necessitated a revisionist view of traditional church dogmas as well as a rejection of the developments which have caused the relatively recent Judaizing of Christianity. Therefore we assert that Christian Identity is the modern expression of legitimate Christian thought, whereas denominational Christianity is a Judaized and false Christianity.

However with the emancipation of the Jews, the rise of secular humanism in Europe had much more of an impact on the dissolution of Christendom as a tangible entity than the much slower infiltration and corruption of the formerly Christian churches. And the motto of secular humanism which espouses the false ideals of liberty, equality and fraternity among all of the worlds races, while itself being anti-Christian, has been a foundational philosophy of the Jewish new world order that has been forced upon the denominational churches wherever they had not readily accepted it.

This leads to the first cognitive disconnect which is evident among anti-Christian White Nationalists which we would like to mention, and it concerns pagans. The pagans think they are somehow returning to the original religion of their ancestors. We do not accept that paradigm, and we can demonstrate historically that Christianity was the original religion of their ancestors, who had turned on God and adopted paganism. However that is not the issue we wish to address here.

Rather, pagans must come to understand and admit the simple truth that any religion, Christian or pagan or otherwise, which had dominated and united Europe throughout the Middle Ages would have ultimately been infiltrated and subverted by the Jews so long as Jews were allowed to operate in Europe, and paganism itself never had any philosophical defense at all against the Jews, so it cannot be imagined that it would have fared any better than Christianity.

Therefore it is not Christianity itself which is to be blamed for failure, but the greed of the noble and priestly classes of Europe who allowed the Jews to operate their usury and their other vices within the European nations. Christianity itself demands that those practices are forbidden, and that Christians not tolerate those who practice them.

This leads us to the next cognitive disconnect we wish to discuss, which is shared by all anti-Christian White Nationalists: they all accept the Jews of today as the people of the Bible, and they all esteem the Bible to be a Jewish book, when the plain fact is that the Jews of today are not the people of the Bible, and they never were.

The people known as Jews today are derived from the Edomite and Canaanite peoples of the histories of the Old Testament. However secularists and pagans and all those who reject the Biblical writings cannot see the evidence of that because they will not take the time to honestly examine the Biblical writings in the light of recorded history.

These Canaanites and the related Edomites were over-represented among the merchant classes for 3,000 years before the time of Christ, and had infiltrated and subverted many of the kingdoms of antiquity. In the Hebrew scriptures, the word for Canaanite had become a synonym for merchant as well as becoming the general label used for the accursed races of Canaan. These same Canaanites were also present in pagan Hellenistic Greece and pagan Imperial Rome and were well-represented among the usurers and merchants of those societies. However much earlier than that, ancient Sumer, which had become known as Babylonia, was fully infiltrated by Canaanite tribes, which is a fact illustrated in the archaeological inscriptions, and therefore it should be clear why the term Mystery Babylon is used to describe the international merchants in the Book of Revelation.

In the Hebrew scriptures, it is the same Canaanites who were responsible for all of the sexual deviancy and perversions of Sodom and Gomorrah. It is the same Canaanites who were the promoters and purveyors of homosexuality and prostitution and every sort of sexual deviancy, which they had organized into the cults of their pagan temples. Then in the second century BC certain tribes of these same Canaanites and Edomites had been conquered and absorbed into the formerly White nation of Judaea. The Judaeans having long been allies of Rome and having a special religious status within the Roman empire, the Edomites found it quite expedient for their own purposes to foment discord so that they could subvert the nation of Judaea and use it for their own purposes. Agitating a revolt against Rome, when it was over the Edomite merchants had taken over completely and Herod the Edomite was in a position to become King.

From that time forward Judaea was a multicultural mess, until 70 AD when Jerusalem was destroyed by the Romans and the Edomite Jews could claim the Hebrew legacy for themselves. The writers of the New Testament, all of them original and White Judaeans, had exposed these Canaanites for the infiltrators and subversives that they were and the original Christians were therefore persecuted for three hundred years. Early Christian writers such as Tertullian and Minucius Felix explained that the persecutions of Christians by pagan Rome had been instigated by the Jews. After three hundred years the Jews could not use the power of Rome to persecute Christianity out of existence.

Once it finally became evident that Christianity would prevail over the Jew, it was tolerated by Rome. But almost immediately it was taken over by the formerly pagan priestly class, and corrupted into a form of paganism itself. The rites and rituals of Roman Catholicism and the sacramentalism which they represent are a hybrid religion of Christian language and pagan rituals. Then from the time of Justinian Christianity was made into an imperialist religion used to further the imperialist desires of Rome.

The Catholic Church never represented the Christianity of the apostles. The original Christian message was persecuted for three hundred years. In spite of that, Christianity continued to grow wherever it spread, for example in Britain, Makedonia and Illyria, in Pontus, and among the Goths and Alans, as well as being underground within the empire. When Rome finally realized that Christianity could not be suppressed, it tolerated it. During the period of toleration, the Christian message was remodeled into an imperialist message by pagan priests who never truly understood Christianity. From this situation came the hegemony of the bishop of Rome which was granted by Justinian in the 6th century. The Roman Catholic Church was always an imperialist organization which must be distinguished from true Christianity. There were times when that imperialist organization did things favorable to Whites, but for the most part, since the late Middle Ages that organization has acted in its own interests against Whites.

The Roman church was never truly Christian, but it did come to accept many Christian ideals, Christian morals, and defend Europe against the Jews. There were always at least a few good Christian men working within the Roman Church and promoting true Christianity. But as a universal church it was disconnected from the truly historical roots of early Christianity. The Roman Catholic Church became a tool for the kings of the empire, and by it the original and independent Christian churches throughout Europe were all eventually subsumed into obedience to a pope.

But just because organized churches have been used to establish a tyranny in the name of Christianity, does not mean that Christianity is to blame. The nefarious forces which did such a thing would have perverted any religion in order to dominate the common folk of Europe. But none of this means that Christianity is not true, or that men should reject God.

If men accept that there is a God, then men realize that they must subject themselves to the laws of God. Doing so, the morality of the society becomes concrete, because man cannot change God’s law at his own whim. Once the men of our race acknowledge that God’s law is good, and choose to conform themselves to it, vibrant societies emerge among us because men can operate in a spirit of mutual trust and companionship. This was the foundation of the medieval German states, England as a world power, and the American republic. The decline of all of those great societies is attributable to the treachery instigated by the Jews, and in particular the manipulation of the international bankers.

Because secular White Nationalists have rejected God and Christ, they have also rejected Christian morality. Popular so-called White Nationalists regularly engage in immoral behavior, and they announce it openly. The introduction of moral relativism came to Europe through the Babylonian Talmud of the Jews, and disseminated itself through the writings of Jews, crypto-Jews and converso-Jews throughout the late Middle Ages. The result is the rise of Secular Humanism, and is accompanied the another Talmudic idea, which is the belief that man can be his own god.

When man believes he can be his own god, then man makes his own law and his own morality. With this, there can never be a spirit of cooperation and harmony and mutual trust among men, and there can never be a stable society, unless the of men can maintain it by force. Therefore the result of Secular Humanism is always tyranny. By rejecting God, the secular humanists have invited upon themselves the tyranny and inevitable Jewish Supremacy which all men everywhere are being forced to live under today, a tyranny which will only progress until it becomes absolutely unbearable. The enemies of Christ know this, and therefore they have tempered the progress of this imposition of tyranny so that it has been slow and imperceptible. The so-called New World Order is therefore the inevitable result of man’s rejection of God, and his acceptance of the immorality of others.

Furthermore, without God, what does racism matter? Without God, as the prophet Isaiah wrote 2,800 years ago, “let us eat and drink; for tomorrow we shall die.” Without God, there are no reasonable grounds for worrying about one’s posterity, since there is no accountability for what one leaves behind, and therefore racism does not matter. Without God, we have no responsibility for our actions in this world. If the forces of fleshly nature alone must prevail, those who reject God and His morality must accept the proliferation of the non-White races and race-mixing Whites as the inevitable outcome since it reflects the present reality.

What is even stranger, is that most secular White Nationalists have accepted as gospel the Jewish and humanist religion of Evolution. Therefore, if we all evolved from nothing, and if the natural proclivity of any individual is to race-mix, then men must accept race-mixing as a part of the evolutionary process, and race-mixing should not be a concern, but should even be viewed as possibly beneficial to nature. In the religion of evolution, the dangerous and destructive gospel of “hybrid vigor” is an important tenet. But without a God, it must be perceived as inevitable and therefore racism is immaterial, and may even be considered evil and counter-productive.

Read More

Atheism is a Jewish Concept

The Jews are well known for promoting atheism, both as an official movement and as an underlying factor in all of their other intellectual movements. There are reasons for this, of course!

Atheism versus God

Atheism as a concept is basically the complete rejection of any God or Creator, along with all so-called ‘organised religion’. It is therefore a religion in and of itself (in a certain sense) because no atheist can prove that God doesn’t exist. Atheism is an odd concept because somehow we are all here, we all exist, matter exists, yet an atheist will insist that everything got here out of nothing, with no creative force behind it. That, as an idea, defies all logic. A belief in God or a Creator, on the other hand, is at least logical because it doesn’t leave us with an impossible dichotomy of getting something out of nothing. I’m not claiming to know how the Creator created everything, I’m simply acknowledging the fact the he did, somehow. This is what I call humbling yourself before a power in the universe much greater than yourself as an individual. You cannot become a God/Creator, nor can you ever explain in nitty-gritty detail, how God does his work. That is not for the mortal man to know. We were not born with the capacity to comprehend such things.

What does atheism leave us with?

In removing God or the Creator from the universe, we are left with only one conclusion – that everything in existence is a result of some kind of accident and everything that happens is completely meaningless. There can be no purpose to living, since belief in this earthly realm being all there is, creates a feeling of futility. “What’s the point of anything? We have no higher purpose to serve, so why would we bother caring?” – Those are the sort of questions atheism throws up, all of which lead to a mindset where nothing has any real meaning. In other words, it leaves us with a nihilistic approach to life.

Who would want us to believe in atheism?

As we know, the Jews and the White Adamic race are eternal enemies, so it would logically figure that as part of their Jewish strategy, they would promote futile nihilistic belief systems, like atheism, in an effort to alienate their enemy from their God and subsequently lose all sense of higher purpose. And isn’t that exactly what we see whenever our people adhere to atheistic concepts? Atheism shatters the life-force in our people, and that is exactly what the Jews designed it to do.

Materialism, atheism, and Jews.

The mixed-race satanic Jews, being a hybridized breed, know that there is no redemption for them in any kind of afterlife. They are aware of this fact, and that is why they live their earthly existences full of greed, selfishness, and with absolutely no spirit of self-sacrifice. They do not care about anything outside the earthly realm because nothing exists for them outside it. Therefore, being entirely earthly minded, it is no surprise to find them as the worlds preeminent materialists. Jews love an empty materialist existence, and this is where our people have learned their corrupt materialist, greedy, me-me-me, attitudes from. It’s not a natural instinct for us to behave like that, but as we know, the Jews are very good at selling their corrupt ideas to the public via the mass media and that’s where it rubs off onto us.

If no higher power or God exists to you, then you’ll become obsessed with the material world and greed will most likely consume you. When people have this atheistic mindset, it only follows that they will be materialists, and therefore may as well be Jews for all intents and purposes. They behave no better than Jews, that’s for sure.

Jews are against God

Jews are not a religious group either. People must forget that idea. Jews worship themselves as their own messiahs, and being a hybrid form on this earth, they have no connection to God or the Creator, therefore they are worshiping a false ‘god’ – themselves. Worshiping yourself is not akin to worshiping God. This is why the Jews can accurately be called atheists as they believe in no higher power. They serve their father Satan, since this entity symbolizes the corruption of all purity in the world, and therefore the destruction of everything which was formed by the Almighty Creator or God.

– White Racial I.D. Admin