Tag Archives: Canaanite Jews

White Nationalist Cognitive Dissonance

Christogenea

Secular White Nationalism, meaning White Nationalism that rejects or insists upon being apart from Christianity, seems to have first appeared in America in the late twentieth century with the likes of David Duke and a motley collection of other rejects from what may have been identified rather loosely as the Christian Patriot movement of the 1950’s through the 1980’s. It is not our purpose to dwell on the beginnings of this movement or how it has grown, however we will mention Mr. Duke again here later on and in another context. Our purpose for now is to discuss some of the shortcomings in the world-views of secular White Nationalists in general, and why they will always continue to fail.

Before we begin, however, we must first state that we do not accept denominational Judeo-Christians to be Christians at all. Rather, they have come to worship Jews rather than Jesus, and seek to advance World Jewish Supremacy rather than the Kingdom of God. The Roman Catholic Church was heavily infiltrated by presumably converted Jews and its literature became awash with truly anti-Christian, Jewish ideas from as early as the 14th century. Even the greatest of Protestant scholars such as Martin Luther were poisoned with the writings of Jews such as Lyra and Burgensis in their formal church educations, and the churches they founded retained those Jewish ideas.

The anti-Christian White Nationalists assume that the modern churches represent Christianity, and that is a bad assumption. The denominational churches had long ago been turned to the will of the internationalist merchants, and their policies have long represented the will of the merchants rather than the will of the Christian God. Many of their policies stand in direct contradiction to the Christian Bible, even in spite of the bad translations which most Bible versions have suffered partly due to these same influences. Much of this phenomenon is readily evident in Church history.

From the 1st through the 16th centuries, and in some cases even beyond that, Jews were consistently and properly portrayed by Christians as devils. In Europe through the 18th century, Jews were practically ostracized from the Christian society. Jews were not allowed to hold Christians as slaves, they were barred from inter-marrying with Christians, Christians were not permitted to borrow money at usury, Jews could not hold public office and they were barred from most occupations. However Jews were found to be useful by many greedy kings and others of the noble class who profited by allowing them to operate their vices and who for that reason even protected them from the wrath of their own citizens.

Because they were allowed to operate their usury and their vices, often surreptitiously, and because they were allowed to operate an international trade over which they had almost exclusive control, the Jews became far richer than most White Europeans even of the noble class, and thereby they became influential enough in Europe to subvert it, using the secret societies and their control of the press to launch a revolution by which they forced their own emancipation. With the coming of Napoleon, for the first time in over a thousand years Jews became equal citizens with Christians in Europe.

After the French Revolution, secular humanism would become the new philosophical paradigm of every nation which the Jews were able to subvert. Where Christianity endured, and especially in America, the denominational churches were subverted with Jewish money to conform with doctrines beneficial to Jewish supremacy. The early popularity of the Scofield and Bullinger Bibles and how their influences have come to dominate American Protestantism is one aspect of the result of such Jewish corruption.

Now this short synopsis may be quite simplified, but it is nevertheless true. While White Nationalists have despised Christianity in name, in reality they know nothing of Christianity because the denominational churches have not ever represented or taught Christianity in its proper historical and literary contexts.

Today the only form of Christianity which comes close to being faithful to those contexts is Christian Identity, which developed among early Christian Patriots in the light of the archaeological discoveries of the 18th through the 20th centuries that have necessitated a revisionist view of traditional church dogmas as well as a rejection of the developments which have caused the relatively recent Judaizing of Christianity. Therefore we assert that Christian Identity is the modern expression of legitimate Christian thought, whereas denominational Christianity is a Judaized and false Christianity.

However with the emancipation of the Jews, the rise of secular humanism in Europe had much more of an impact on the dissolution of Christendom as a tangible entity than the much slower infiltration and corruption of the formerly Christian churches. And the motto of secular humanism which espouses the false ideals of liberty, equality and fraternity among all of the worlds races, while itself being anti-Christian, has been a foundational philosophy of the Jewish new world order that has been forced upon the denominational churches wherever they had not readily accepted it.

This leads to the first cognitive disconnect which is evident among anti-Christian White Nationalists which we would like to mention, and it concerns pagans. The pagans think they are somehow returning to the original religion of their ancestors. We do not accept that paradigm, and we can demonstrate historically that Christianity was the original religion of their ancestors, who had turned on God and adopted paganism. However that is not the issue we wish to address here.

Rather, pagans must come to understand and admit the simple truth that any religion, Christian or pagan or otherwise, which had dominated and united Europe throughout the Middle Ages would have ultimately been infiltrated and subverted by the Jews so long as Jews were allowed to operate in Europe, and paganism itself never had any philosophical defense at all against the Jews, so it cannot be imagined that it would have fared any better than Christianity.

Therefore it is not Christianity itself which is to be blamed for failure, but the greed of the noble and priestly classes of Europe who allowed the Jews to operate their usury and their other vices within the European nations. Christianity itself demands that those practices are forbidden, and that Christians not tolerate those who practice them.

This leads us to the next cognitive disconnect we wish to discuss, which is shared by all anti-Christian White Nationalists: they all accept the Jews of today as the people of the Bible, and they all esteem the Bible to be a Jewish book, when the plain fact is that the Jews of today are not the people of the Bible, and they never were.

The people known as Jews today are derived from the Edomite and Canaanite peoples of the histories of the Old Testament. However secularists and pagans and all those who reject the Biblical writings cannot see the evidence of that because they will not take the time to honestly examine the Biblical writings in the light of recorded history.

These Canaanites and the related Edomites were over-represented among the merchant classes for 3,000 years before the time of Christ, and had infiltrated and subverted many of the kingdoms of antiquity. In the Hebrew scriptures, the word for Canaanite had become a synonym for merchant as well as becoming the general label used for the accursed races of Canaan. These same Canaanites were also present in pagan Hellenistic Greece and pagan Imperial Rome and were well-represented among the usurers and merchants of those societies. However much earlier than that, ancient Sumer, which had become known as Babylonia, was fully infiltrated by Canaanite tribes, which is a fact illustrated in the archaeological inscriptions, and therefore it should be clear why the term Mystery Babylon is used to describe the international merchants in the Book of Revelation.

In the Hebrew scriptures, it is the same Canaanites who were responsible for all of the sexual deviancy and perversions of Sodom and Gomorrah. It is the same Canaanites who were the promoters and purveyors of homosexuality and prostitution and every sort of sexual deviancy, which they had organized into the cults of their pagan temples. Then in the second century BC certain tribes of these same Canaanites and Edomites had been conquered and absorbed into the formerly White nation of Judaea. The Judaeans having long been allies of Rome and having a special religious status within the Roman empire, the Edomites found it quite expedient for their own purposes to foment discord so that they could subvert the nation of Judaea and use it for their own purposes. Agitating a revolt against Rome, when it was over the Edomite merchants had taken over completely and Herod the Edomite was in a position to become King.

From that time forward Judaea was a multicultural mess, until 70 AD when Jerusalem was destroyed by the Romans and the Edomite Jews could claim the Hebrew legacy for themselves. The writers of the New Testament, all of them original and White Judaeans, had exposed these Canaanites for the infiltrators and subversives that they were and the original Christians were therefore persecuted for three hundred years. Early Christian writers such as Tertullian and Minucius Felix explained that the persecutions of Christians by pagan Rome had been instigated by the Jews. After three hundred years the Jews could not use the power of Rome to persecute Christianity out of existence.

Once it finally became evident that Christianity would prevail over the Jew, it was tolerated by Rome. But almost immediately it was taken over by the formerly pagan priestly class, and corrupted into a form of paganism itself. The rites and rituals of Roman Catholicism and the sacramentalism which they represent are a hybrid religion of Christian language and pagan rituals. Then from the time of Justinian Christianity was made into an imperialist religion used to further the imperialist desires of Rome.

The Catholic Church never represented the Christianity of the apostles. The original Christian message was persecuted for three hundred years. In spite of that, Christianity continued to grow wherever it spread, for example in Britain, Makedonia and Illyria, in Pontus, and among the Goths and Alans, as well as being underground within the empire. When Rome finally realized that Christianity could not be suppressed, it tolerated it. During the period of toleration, the Christian message was remodeled into an imperialist message by pagan priests who never truly understood Christianity. From this situation came the hegemony of the bishop of Rome which was granted by Justinian in the 6th century. The Roman Catholic Church was always an imperialist organization which must be distinguished from true Christianity. There were times when that imperialist organization did things favorable to Whites, but for the most part, since the late Middle Ages that organization has acted in its own interests against Whites.

The Roman church was never truly Christian, but it did come to accept many Christian ideals, Christian morals, and defend Europe against the Jews. There were always at least a few good Christian men working within the Roman Church and promoting true Christianity. But as a universal church it was disconnected from the truly historical roots of early Christianity. The Roman Catholic Church became a tool for the kings of the empire, and by it the original and independent Christian churches throughout Europe were all eventually subsumed into obedience to a pope.

But just because organized churches have been used to establish a tyranny in the name of Christianity, does not mean that Christianity is to blame. The nefarious forces which did such a thing would have perverted any religion in order to dominate the common folk of Europe. But none of this means that Christianity is not true, or that men should reject God.

If men accept that there is a God, then men realize that they must subject themselves to the laws of God. Doing so, the morality of the society becomes concrete, because man cannot change God’s law at his own whim. Once the men of our race acknowledge that God’s law is good, and choose to conform themselves to it, vibrant societies emerge among us because men can operate in a spirit of mutual trust and companionship. This was the foundation of the medieval German states, England as a world power, and the American republic. The decline of all of those great societies is attributable to the treachery instigated by the Jews, and in particular the manipulation of the international bankers.

Because secular White Nationalists have rejected God and Christ, they have also rejected Christian morality. Popular so-called White Nationalists regularly engage in immoral behavior, and they announce it openly. The introduction of moral relativism came to Europe through the Babylonian Talmud of the Jews, and disseminated itself through the writings of Jews, crypto-Jews and converso-Jews throughout the late Middle Ages. The result is the rise of Secular Humanism, and is accompanied the another Talmudic idea, which is the belief that man can be his own god.

When man believes he can be his own god, then man makes his own law and his own morality. With this, there can never be a spirit of cooperation and harmony and mutual trust among men, and there can never be a stable society, unless the of men can maintain it by force. Therefore the result of Secular Humanism is always tyranny. By rejecting God, the secular humanists have invited upon themselves the tyranny and inevitable Jewish Supremacy which all men everywhere are being forced to live under today, a tyranny which will only progress until it becomes absolutely unbearable. The enemies of Christ know this, and therefore they have tempered the progress of this imposition of tyranny so that it has been slow and imperceptible. The so-called New World Order is therefore the inevitable result of man’s rejection of God, and his acceptance of the immorality of others.

Furthermore, without God, what does racism matter? Without God, as the prophet Isaiah wrote 2,800 years ago, “let us eat and drink; for tomorrow we shall die.” Without God, there are no reasonable grounds for worrying about one’s posterity, since there is no accountability for what one leaves behind, and therefore racism does not matter. Without God, we have no responsibility for our actions in this world. If the forces of fleshly nature alone must prevail, those who reject God and His morality must accept the proliferation of the non-White races and race-mixing Whites as the inevitable outcome since it reflects the present reality.

What is even stranger, is that most secular White Nationalists have accepted as gospel the Jewish and humanist religion of Evolution. Therefore, if we all evolved from nothing, and if the natural proclivity of any individual is to race-mix, then men must accept race-mixing as a part of the evolutionary process, and race-mixing should not be a concern, but should even be viewed as possibly beneficial to nature. In the religion of evolution, the dangerous and destructive gospel of “hybrid vigor” is an important tenet. But without a God, it must be perceived as inevitable and therefore racism is immaterial, and may even be considered evil and counter-productive.

Read More

The Holocaust And The Liars at John 8:44

John 8:44

“You are of your father the devil, and you want to do the desires of your father. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth because there is no truth in him. Whenever he speaks a lie, he speaks from his own nature, for he is a liar and the father of lies.

From just a cursory glance at John 8:44 it is obvious what racial group is being referred to – I.e. The Canaanite/Edomite Jews. They are indeed the great “father of lies” who “speaks from his own nature”, and only they could possibly invent a hoax as big as the Holocaust!

– White Racial I.D. Admin

A Short History of Usury in Europe

By Sven Longshanks

6a00d8341c61e653ef00e54f31da138833-640wi_thumb[3]

Gradually over the years usury has been redefined from being an amount asked for on top of the principle amount of a loan, to just being ‘excessive interest’. This has been a slow process, happening over the last 500 years, but before that, usury had its original and true meaning which is asking for anything over and above the principal amount loaned.

It was seen as unjust earnings and four times worse than theft in legal terms. Although it is usually applied today only to money, which is not a thing in itself but a measure of value, back then it did not just apply to the loaning of money, but to the loaning of anything. You would not loan a coat to somebody and expect a pair of trousers with it to come back and the same common sense applied to the loaning of money.

The church saw it as a mortal sin and prosecuted it as such for 1500 years, with usurers being refused absolution, their will and testimony being nullified and their descendants deprived of all inheritance, usurers would have no Christian burial and all their possessions would be seized and distributed among the poor.

It was seen as being against the divine law, natural law and mans law, as it was gaining an increase through unnatural means and cheating man of the time that God had given him, by using it up in paying for something which did not exist and was not a part of the loan.

The prohibition on usury led to the concept of a ‘just price’ and a living wage, which was enough for a man to support a wife and four children. It was the intrinsic value of the work or product to the community that mattered, not making a profit on it for the individual. Supply and demand were no reason to raise prices, to charge more than the correct price was a sin and competition or monopolies were unheard of.

People did trade at a profit, but they did not trade for profit. The object of working was to help your community, not yourself and the living wage was adequate, but not luxurious. Without the community the individual would have nothing, so to seek to make a profit from that community for doing nothing other than your duty to it, was quite rightly seen as wrong. The rich were looked upon with suspicion and pity and they were required by their own faith to give to the poor, or to loan to them expecting nothing back on top.

The mediaeval guilds determined what the just price and the living wage were. In the middle ages, 14 weeks of the year were all that a labourer needed to work for in order to provide for his  entire family. In their spare time, the people would help build the cathedrals and churches throughout Europe which were all built voluntarily with no debt or mortgage involved. This also became a good way to learn new skills.

A usurer did nothing to help his community, he forsook husbandry or merchandise and instead was a parasite, worse than a thief, since thieves only stole from the rich and out of necessity. The usurer wished for others to lack so that he might profit. Even the word ‘profit’ has had its meaning changed from that of ‘to advance, or to progress’ to ‘a pecuniary gain resulting from employment of capital in a transaction’ thanks to usury.

190703_thumb[2]

Death comes for the usurer

The Jews and Usury

It was practically unheard of in Europe until the Jews entered and a large part of the reason for this was the church teaching on it. The Bible sees usury as a weapon of war and the Israelites were banned from lending anything out at usury to one another, they were only to use it against their enemies the Canaanites, who were already employing it among themselves. Alfred the Great included the laws and punishments for usury when he collected the ancient laws of Britain together into one place and these differed from the Roman laws, which allowed the charging of interest but only to a certain extent.

It was by following the Roman laws as opposed to the Biblical laws that the Popes would gradually relax the Catholic church teaching on usury later on, which was then imitated by the Protestants. If there had not been two laws in operation, one for the Jews and one for the Christians, this situation where the church chose to ignore Biblical teaching on the subject would not have been able to arise. The Jews were first brought into Britain by William Norman in 1066 to act as tax collectors for him. When they arrived they also began loaning out money and because they were not Christian, they were able to argue that they should not have to follow Christian laws. Any decent king who cared for his subjects would not allow anyone into their country that did not have to follow the same laws as everyone else and the good kings of Britain up until this time had refused to allow any Jews in.

As well as lending money out they also started clipping the coins, melting the slivers down and then smuggling them into Europe. This was the origins of the spy network that the Rothschilds would later make use of to gain inside information on the battle of Waterloo, eventually transferring secrets from the royal courts instead of the wealth of one country into another. Along with depriving the nation of its gold and bleeding the peasants dry through usury, the Jews also started abducting children and torturing them to death. This last outrage was the final straw and Edward I expelled them from the country in 1290.

It is a great shame that the popes and Kings of Italy did not immediately do the same, but instead they tolerated the Jews and allowed them to set their money lending operations up, where they soon started fleecing the poor again and ingratiating themselves with the aristocracy. It was the result of the Jews making the poor even poorer that became the excuse for the Catholic church to start up their own version of a bank.

montedipieta_thumb[2]

The Monte de Pieta ‘charity’ bank

The gradual rise of the usurious bank

The ‘Monte de Pieta’ was supposed to be a charity bank and the first one was set up in Florence around 1350. Its brief was to provide loans to the poor to prevent them from being preyed upon by the Jewish money lenders, but they themselves started stealing people’s time, by claiming that charges for administration needed to be made. However in Britain a real one was set up by Bishop Michael Nothburg, with a deposit of 1,000 silver marks that were lent in exchange for pawned objects, no charges for admin were made at this genuine charity bank as it was run by people who gave of their time for free to help the poor, rather than to make a profit.

Gradually the Monte de Pieta grew, until it was funding the state of Florence and charging the people the equivalent of taxes to pay for it. It offered an interest rate for deposits as well as collecting interest on the loans. Eventually 86% of the debts were owed to the richest 10% of the province, who also happened to be the ones setting the interest rates.

In 1382 a usurer’s legal indulgence was proclaimed, absolving them from civil and criminal prosecution and the ‘just price’ started to be challenged by the lawyers, who wanted the right for every man to make the best bargain he could for himself. Prior to this, even charging more for goods on credit had been seen as theft. As the renaissance dawned, the Italians started looking to Roman law for ways to justify their sinful banks, rather than looking at Biblical and Christian precedents. Emperor Justinian had set a standard that the popes were to end up following, condemning usury on the one hand, while setting acceptable rates for it with the other. The Italian lawyers claimed that laws must change to keep pace with the time, that usury was a worldly necessity and that the ban on it was a ‘product of irrational superstition’. They started undermining the guilds that had previously set the ‘just price’ and revived the Roman laws that legalised usury and permitted speculation in prices.

Eventually in 1515, Pope Leo X declared the charity banks to be ‘meritorious’ and that anyone who disagreed was a heretic. This was an unprecedented overthrow of Christian social justice and enabled the Jewish money lenders to team up with the Gentile ones, under the cover of ‘protecting the poor from usurers’. It caused a complete reversal from the original meaning of commerce, which had formally been a way of interacting with and giving back to the community, and now became a way of taking from the community with individual material gain its primary motive. The economy had changed from being one of ‘mutual protection, to being one of unilateral capitalist exploitation.’

In England Henry VIII changed the law to follow the example of the Pope in 1538 but Edward VI banned it again in 1545 calling it ‘unnatural and equivalent to man-slaughter or homicide, entirely wrong in itself and damnable.’

Unfortunately King Edward’s usury ban only lasted until 1571, where it was repealed by Elizabeth I’s parliament. All mention of God and his law against usury disappeared and instead ‘acceptable’ rates of usury were set, making it allowed if it was at no more than 10%. In 1600 the East India Trading company caused the demand for loans to grow and usury became an integral part of the monarchy’s economic model, with James I’s absurdly titled ‘law against usury’ making it seem a normal and necessary part of life by 1624.

theenglishusurer_thumb[2]

The Jews enter Britain again

It was shortly after this that Oliver Cromwell overthrew King Charles I and had him beheaded in 1649, with an army financed by Jewish bankers from Holland. The Jews then managed to talk Cromwell into allowing emissaries of theirs back into England so that they could make their case for being allowed back in to the country. Cromwell was eventually deposed after doing incredible amounts of damage to Britain, starting a civil war in England, executing the rightful king and then going to war against Ireland. After he died, he was dug up again and hanged for his crimes, before being beheaded himself and his head stuck on 24 foot spike on top of Westminster hall.

The next King, Charles II officially allowed the Jews back into the country again but the law for expelling them still remains on the books, as you cannot undo laws. It is just waiting there to be revived. The Jews had no loyalty to Charles though and straight away started plotting to depose his heir and brother King James II, the last Catholic King of England with the help of William of Orange. Once Dutch King Billy had the reigns of the country, he repaid the Jews who had helped him by giving them a charter allowing them to call themselves ‘The Bank of England’ in 1694. It looks very much like he gave away the sovereign right of the nation to create its own money, in exchange for him being put on the throne of England.

It was from here that they were then able to start fractional reserve banking, which means loaning out much more than you could ever cover in deposits, because nobody ever asks for all the deposits back all at once. They were able to fund other banks throughout Europe all working to the same principle and had no shortage of people wanting loans in order to trade with the far reaches of the empire and the New World.

hanbury-street_thumb[3]

The Jews had this removed for being ‘anti-Semitic’ and by doing so they admitted that all bankers are Jews.

The rise of the Rothschilds

In 1745 Pope Benedict XIV expanded Pope Leo X’s law, to make interest on investment credit capital legal and allowed ‘certain other titles to run parallel with the loan’. Shortly after this the Rothschild family began banking using the smuggling routes mentioned earlier as communication lines, with which they were able to get inside information on Waterloo and crash the London Stock Exchange. By doing this they were able to buy up controlling shares in much of the industry of Britain as well as the banks themselves, replacing the few gentiles that had been involved in it since the lifting of the restrictions by the Church.

The first loan from a Rothschild bank to the pope was in 1832 and by 1850 there had been another, for 50 million francs. In 1857 Peter’s pence was pledged as collateral and by 1872 the Holy See was upping the allowed interest rate to 8%. In 1918 Benedict XV proclaimed that it was not illicit to reap a legal profit from loans and by 1983 John Paul II had actually made it a requirement of all church admins to ‘invest for profit all funds not needed for expenses’.

This is far removed from the original church teaching for clergy and laymen alike, which can be summed up with this quote from the council of Tarragona, canon II: ‘Whosoever will be in the clergy, let him be careful not to buy too cheap, or sell too dear, or let him be removed from the clergy’.

From the bank of England the Jews were able to start the World Bank and the IMF and decouple banking entirely from the precious metals that it had started with. This eventually had to happen, as once you add interest to the system it has to continually expand, in order for there to be enough currency in circulation to pay back the previous loans. If you lend out a hundred pounds, there is only a hundred pounds in circulation that can be paid back, so if the bank asks for more than a hundred back, the only way for the extra to be found is if another loan is taken out somewhere which puts the extra money into circulation. You can see that this system is terminal and will always cause inflation and savings to lose their original value.

This is the real reason why the banking system crashed, it was an deliberate flaw built into the system right from the beginning and this is why the divine law forbids the taking of any interest, no matter how small the amount.

usurers in hell_thumb[2]

Usurers in hell.

Original Article